GIZNEXT Logo

Compare HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) Vs Samsung Exynos 2100

What is the difference between Samsung Exynos 2100 and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G)? Should you buy phone having Samsung Exynos 2100 or should go for HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G)? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.

Samsung Exynos 2100 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 687807 and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has AnTuTu score of 436390. Samsung Exynos 2100 comes up with 8 cores, 2900 MHz frequency and on the other hand, HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has 8 cores and 2860 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, Samsung Exynos 2100 has Mali-G78 MP14 GPU and Vallhall 2 architecture and latter HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) comes up with Mali G76 MP16 GPU and Bifrost architecture.

Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.

Exynos 2100 Vs Kirin 990 (4G)

SpecificationsExynos 2100Kirin 990 (4G)
Total score687807436390
Frequency2900 MHz2860 MHz
Max size16 GB12 GB
Max display resolution4096 x 21603360 x 1440
+ Read More- Read Less

Compare Chipsets

AnTuTu Score
CPU 198813138017
GPU 275313145170
Memory 12368598516
UX 8793055324
Total score 687807436390
Connectivity Features
4G support LTE Cat. 24LTE Cat. 21
5G support YesNo
Download speed Up to 3000 MbpsUp to 1400 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 422 MbpsUp to 200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 66
Bluetooth 5.25.0
Performance
Processor 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-X13x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A784x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A552x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A762x 2.09 GHz – Cortex-A764x 1.86 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 88
Frequency 2900 MHz2860 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-AARMv8-A
Process 5 nanometers7 nanometers
TDP 9 W6 W
Geekbench Score
Image compression 170.5 Mpixels/s148.7 Mpixels/s
Face detection 26.7 images/s23.9 images/s
Speech recognition 64.15 words/s54.1 words/s
Machine learning 51.35 images/s55.8 images/s
Camera shooting 33.9 images/s28.2 images/s
HTML 5 3.21 Mnodes/s3.13 Mnodes/s
SQLite 970.15 Krows/s797.5 Krows/s
Graphics
GPU name Mali-G78 MP14Mali G76 MP16
Architecture Vallhall 2Bifrost
GPU frequency 760 MHz600 MHz
Execution units 1416
Shading units 224256
Vulkan version 1.11.0
OpenCL version 2.02.0
DirectX version 1212
Memory Info
Memory type LPDDR5LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s31.78 Gbit/s
Max size 16 GB12 GB
Multimedia
Neural processor (NPU) YesDa Vinci
Storage type UFS 3.1UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 4096 x 21603360 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS4K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9H.264, H.265, VC-1
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAVAIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Browse Chipset By

Which Chipset would you prefer?

Vote
Total:9

Detailed Comparison of Exynos 2100 vs Kirin 990 (4G)

Samsung Exynos 2100 has been announced on December 2020 whereas HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has been announced on October 2019. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:

Benchmark Comparison: Exynos 2100 vs Kirin 990 (4G)

Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Exynos 2100 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 687807 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 198813, 275313, 123685, 87930 respectively.

CPU Comparison: Exynos 2100 vs Kirin 990 (4G)

CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Exynos 2100 comes up with the architecture of Vallhall 2 and Kirin 990 (4G) comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 8 core and 2900 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2860 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.

Graphics Comparison: Exynos 2100 vs Kirin 990 (4G)

Samsung Exynos 2100 has Mali-G78 MP14 GPU with GPU Frequency as 760 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has Mali G76 MP16 GPU with GPU Frequency as 600 MHz.

Memory Comparison: Exynos 2100 vs Kirin 990 (4G)

First chipset has max size of 16 GB and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has max size of 16 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.

Multimedia And Connectivity Comparison: Exynos 2100 vs Kirin 990 (4G)

In terms of multimedia, Exynos 2100 has Yes NPU with storage type as UFS 3.1 and Kirin 990 (4G) has Da Vinci NPU and UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 storage type.

FAQs

Exynos 2100 has higher AnTuTu score at 687807 compare to Kirin 990 (4G) with total AnTuTu score at 436390 only.
Exynos 2100 has a higher base frequency of 2900 MHz compared to Kirin 990 (4G) with 2860 MHz base frequency.
Exynos 2100 with 51.2 Gbit/s bandwidth is better than Kirin 990 (4G) with 31.78 Gbit/s bandwidth.
Both Kirin 990 (4G) and Exynos 2100 have same cores value of 8 cores.

Popular Mobile Chipset Brands