What is the difference between Samsung Exynos 980 and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G)? Should you buy phone having Samsung Exynos 980 or should go for HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G)? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
Samsung Exynos 980 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 336267 and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has AnTuTu score of 436390. Samsung Exynos 980 comes up with 8 cores, 2200 MHz frequency and on the other hand, HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has 8 cores and 2860 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, Samsung Exynos 980 has Mali G76MP5 GPU and Bifrost architecture and latter HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) comes up with Mali G76 MP16 GPU and Bifrost architecture.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
Specifications | Exynos 980 | Kirin 990 (4G) |
---|---|---|
Total score | 336267 | 436390 |
Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2860 MHz |
Max size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Max display resolution | 3360 x 1440 | 3360 x 1440 |
AnTuTu Score | ||
CPU | 120146 | 138017 |
GPU | 88635 | 145170 |
Memory | 62029 | 98516 |
UX | 62998 | 55324 |
Total score | 336267 | 436390 |
Connectivity Features | ||
Modem | Exynos 5123 | |
4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 21 |
5G support | Yes | No |
Download speed | Up to 2550 Mbps | Up to 1400 Mbps |
Upload speed | Up to 1280 Mbps | Up to 200 Mbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
Processor | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A776x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A762x 2.09 GHz – Cortex-A764x 1.86 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2860 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
Process | 8 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
TDP | 9 W | 6 W |
Graphics | ||
GPU name | Mali G76MP5 | Mali G76 MP16 |
Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 5 | 16 |
Shading units | 80 | 256 |
FLOPS | 576 Gigaflops | 768 Gigaflops |
Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.0 |
OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Bus | 2x 32 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
Max size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia | ||
Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Da Vinci |
Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 |
Max display resolution | 3360 x 1440 | 3360 x 1440 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | |
Video capture | 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
Video playback | 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VC-1 |
Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Samsung Exynos 980 has been announced on September 2019 whereas HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has been announced on October 2019. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Exynos 980 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 336267 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 120146, 88635, 62029, 62998 respectively.
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Exynos 980 comes up with the architecture of Bifrost and Kirin 990 (4G) comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 8 core and 2200 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2860 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
Samsung Exynos 980 has Mali G76MP5 GPU with GPU Frequency as 720 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has Mali G76 MP16 GPU with GPU Frequency as 600 MHz.
First chipset has max size of 8 GB and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has max size of 8 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
In terms of multimedia, Exynos 980 has Yes NPU with storage type as UFS 2.1 and Kirin 990 (4G) has Da Vinci NPU and UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 storage type.