Popular Products
Compare HTC Wildfire E1 Vs Xiaomi Redmi A1
Should you buy HTC Wildfire E1 or Xiaomi Redmi A1? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in Bangladesh, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. HTC Wildfire E1 starts at BDT 8,862 and Xiaomi Redmi A1 starts at BDT 8,578.
HTC Wildfire E1 has screen size of 6.09 inches and Xiaomi Redmi A1 has screen size of 6.52 inches. HTC Wildfire E1 comes up with internal storage of 32 GB and RAM of 3 GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 13 MP and front camera of 5 MP whereas latter has primary camera of 8MP f/2.2 (Wide Angle), (Ai lens) with autofocus and front camera of 5 MP.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
HTC Wildfire E1 Vs Xiaomi Redmi A1
| Specifications | HTC Wildfire E1 | Xiaomi Redmi A1 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | |
| Screen Size | 6.09 inches | 6.52 inches |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6763 Helio P23 (16 nm) | |
| RAM | 3 GB | |
| Internal Storage | 32 GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 77 | 62 | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | ||
| Screen Size | 6.09 inches | 6.52 inches | |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6763 Helio P23 (16 nm) | ||
| RAM | 3 GB | ||
| Internal Storage | 32 GB | ||
GENERAL | |||
| Colours | Black, Gold, Blue/Violet | ||
| Sim | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | |
| Operating System | Android 9.0 (Pie) | ||
Similiar Alternatives
- HTC Wildfire E1
- Xiaomi Redmi A1
DESIGN | |||
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 192 g | |
| Body Material | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | ||
DISPLAY | |||
| Screen size | 6.09 inches | 6.52 inches | |
| Technology | IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors | ||
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio | 720 x 1600 pixels | |
| Pixel Density | 282 ppi density | ~269 PPI | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6763 Helio P23 (16 nm) | ||
| GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 | ||
| RAM | 3 GB | ||
STORAGE | |||
| Internal Storage | 32 GB | ||
| Card Slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | ||
CAMERA | |||
| Primary camera | 13 MP | 8MP f/2.2 (Wide Angle), (Ai lens) with autofocus | |
| Camera Features | LED flash | HDR, panorama | |
| Front Camera | 5 MP | 5 MP | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | ||
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | Yes, USB-C | |
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | Yes, v5.0 | |
| GPS Facility | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | |
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 3G | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | ||
| 2G | Yes | ||
| 5G | Yes | ||
| 4G | Yes | ||
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Quick Charging | Fast battery charging | ||
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, Virtual Light Sensor, Virtual Proximity Sensor | |
Pros and Cons | ||
| Pros |
| |
| Cons |
| |
Similiar Comparisions
- HTC Wildfire E1
- Xiaomi Redmi A1
Popular Mobile
- Under 12K
- 12-25K
- 25-50K
- Above 50K
Detailed Comparison of HTC Wildfire E1 vs Xiaomi Redmi A1
Design Comparison: HTC Wildfire E1 vs Xiaomi Redmi A1
HTC Wildfire E1 comes up with a weight of 165 g (5.82 oz) whereas Xiaomi Redmi A1 weights around 192 g. Thickness of HTC Wildfire E1 is 8.9 mm and the thickness of other mobiles is 9.09 mm.
Display Comparison: HTC Wildfire E1 vs Xiaomi Redmi A1
HTC Wildfire E1 has screen size of 6.09 inches whereas other comes up with 6.52 inches. Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio and 720 x 1600 pixels respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors and latter uses undefined.
Camera Comparison: HTC Wildfire E1 vs Xiaomi Redmi A1
HTC Wildfire E1 comes up with primary camera of 13 MP whereas Xiaomi Redmi A1 comes up with 8MP f/2.2 (Wide Angle), (Ai lens) with autofocus. Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include LED flash.