Popular Products
Compare Oppo Find X7 Vs ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro
Should you buy Oppo Find X7 or ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in Bangladesh, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Oppo Find X7 starts at BDT 64,459 and ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro starts at BDT 72,336.
Oppo Find X7 has screen size of 6.7 inches and ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro has screen size of 6.8 inches. Oppo Find X7 comes up with internal storage of 128 GB/256 GB and RAM of 8 GB/12 GB. ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro comes up with internal storage of 128GB / 256GB / 512GB and RAM of 12GB / 16GB / 18GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 50 MP (f/1.8 and front camera of 32 MP (f/2.4 whereas latter has primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.8, wide) + 8 MP (f/2.0, ultrawide) + 2 MP (macro) +PDAF and front camera of 32 MP (f/2.0, wide) + HDR.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Oppo Find X7 Vs ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro
| Specifications | Oppo Find X7 | ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Screen Size | 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 +Gen 2 |
| RAM | 8 GB/12 GB | 12GB / 16GB / 18GB |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB/256 GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13 | |
| Screen Size | 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 +Gen 2 | |
| RAM | 8 GB/12 GB | 12GB / 16GB / 18GB | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB/256 GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
GENERAL | |||
| Colours | Gloss Black, Blue, White | Silver, Blue/Red | |
| Operating System | Android 12 | Android 13 | |
| Sim | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, eSIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Oppo Find X7
- ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro
DESIGN | |||
| Body Material | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | |
| Height | 163.6 mm | ||
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 215 g | |
| Width | 74 mm | ||
DISPLAY | |||
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 ratio | 20:9 ratio | |
| Display Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | ||
| Pixel Density | 525 ppi | 387 ppi density | |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | ||
| Screen resolution | 1440 x 3216 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixel | |
| Screen size | 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches | |
| Technology | LTPO AMOLED | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes, with Multitouch | Yes, with Multitouch | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 +Gen 2 | |
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Kryo 680 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 680 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 680) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 650 | |
| RAM | 8 GB/12 GB | 12GB / 16GB / 18GB | |
STORAGE | |||
| Card Slot | No | No | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB/256 GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| Messaging | Yes | ||
| Phonebook | Yes | ||
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | ||
| Front Camera | 32 MP (f/2.4 | 32 MP (f/2.0, wide) + HDR | |
| Primary camera | 50 MP (f/1.8 | 64 MP (f/1.8, wide) + 8 MP (f/2.0, ultrawide) + 2 MP (macro) +PDAF | |
| Video Recording | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10 bit video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | |
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | Yes | ||
| Audio Player | Yes | ||
| Speakers | Yes | ||
| Video Player | Yes | ||
BATTERY | |||
| Capacity | Non-removable Li-Po 5000 mAh battery | 5000 mAh | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, aptX, LE | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL | |
| USB | 3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go | USB Type-C 3.0, USB On-The-Go; accessory connector | |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | ||
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | Yes | Yes | |
| 3G | Yes | Yes | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes | Yes | |
| Quick Charging | Fast battery charging 65W | Fast charging 120W | |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
Popular Mobile
- Under 12K
- 12-25K
- 25-50K
- Above 50K
Detailed Comparison of Oppo Find X7 vs ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro
Display Comparison: Oppo Find X7 vs ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro
Oppo Find X7 has screen size of 6.7 inches whereas other comes up with 6.8 inches. Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 1440 x 3216 pixels and 1080 x 2400 pixel respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses LTPO AMOLED and latter uses undefined.
Camera Comparison: Oppo Find X7 vs ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro
Oppo Find X7 comes up with primary camera of 50 MP (f/1.8 whereas ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro comes up with 64 MP (f/1.8, wide) + 8 MP (f/2.0, ultrawide) + 2 MP (macro) +PDAF. Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include LED flash, HDR, panorama.
Performance Comparison: Oppo Find X7 vs ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 +Gen 2 respectively. Oppo Find X7 comes up No card slot and ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro comes up with No card slot. CPU used in Oppo Find X7 is Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Kryo 680 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 680 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 680) and used in ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro is Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510).