Popular Products
Compare Oppo Reno 8 5G Vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2
Should you buy Oppo Reno 8 5G or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in Bangladesh, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Oppo Reno 8 5G starts at BDT 39,598 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 starts at BDT 178,198.
Oppo Reno 8 5G has screen size of 6.43 inches and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has screen size of 7.6 inches + 6.23 inches Cover Display . Oppo Reno 8 5G comes up with internal storage of 128 GB and RAM of 8 GB. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 comes up with internal storage of 256 GB and RAM of 12 GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 50 MP (f/1.8, Wide Angle) + 8 MP (f/2.2, Ultra Wide) + 2 MP (f/2.4, Macro) + autofocus and front camera of 32 MP ( f/2.4, Wide Angle) Punch Hole whereas latter has primary camera of 12 MP (f/1.8) and front camera of 10 MP Selfie Camera (10MP Cover Camera).
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Oppo Reno 8 5G Vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2
| Specifications | Oppo Reno 8 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 6.43 inches | 7.6 inches + 6.23 inches Cover Display |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865+ (7 nm+) |
| RAM | 8 GB | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 86 | 90 | |
| OS | Android OS, 10 | ||
| Screen Size | 6.43 inches | 7.6 inches + 6.23 inches Cover Display | |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865+ (7 nm+) | |
| RAM | 8 GB | ||
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB | |
GENERAL | |||
| Device type | Smartphone | Foldable Phone | |
| Sim | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim (nano + eSIM) | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Oppo Reno 8 5G
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2
DESIGN | |||
| Weight | 179 g | 279 g | |
DISPLAY | |||
| Aspect Ratio | 20:09 | 372 | |
| Screen size | 6.43 inches | 7.6 inches + 6.23 inches Cover Display | |
| Touchscreen | Yes, with Multitouch | Capacitive Touchscreen | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865+ (7 nm+) | |
| CPU | 3 GHz, Octa Core Processor | Octa Core (1x3.09 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 585) | |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 650 | |
| RAM | 8 GB | ||
STORAGE | |||
| Card Slot | No | ||
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB | |
CAMERA | |||
| Front Camera | 32 MP ( f/2.4, Wide Angle) Punch Hole | 10 MP Selfie Camera (10MP Cover Camera) | |
| Primary camera | 50 MP (f/1.8, Wide Angle) + 8 MP (f/2.2, Ultra Wide) + 2 MP (f/2.4, Macro) + autofocus | 12 MP (f/1.8) | |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30fps UHD, 1080p @ 120fps FHD | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60/240fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps | |
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| FM Radio | No | ||
BATTERY | |||
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | Non-removable Li-Ion 4500 mAh battery | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | v5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | |
| Browser | Yes | HTML5 | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v2.0 | USB Type-C, 3.1 | |
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 3G | Yes | Yes | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes | |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | Yes, Side | |
| Sensors | Geomagnetic Induction, Light Induction, Proximity Sensor, Acceleration Sensor, Gravity Sensor, Gyroscope, Support Step Function | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer | |
Similiar Comparisions
- Oppo Reno 8 5G
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2
Popular Mobile
- Under 12K
- 12-25K
- 25-50K
- Above 50K
Detailed Comparison of Oppo Reno 8 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2
Camera Comparison: Oppo Reno 8 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2
Oppo Reno 8 5G comes up with primary camera of 50 MP (f/1.8, Wide Angle) + 8 MP (f/2.2, Ultra Wide) + 2 MP (f/2.4, Macro) + autofocus whereas Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 comes up with 12 MP (f/1.8). Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include undefined.