Popular Products
Compare Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Vs Vivo V23 5G
Should you buy Samsung Galaxy A34 5G or Vivo V23 5G? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in Bangladesh, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G starts at BDT 41,209 and Vivo V23 5G starts at BDT 38,214.
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G has screen size of 6.6 inches and Vivo V23 5G has screen size of 6.44 inches. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G comes up with internal storage of 128GB and RAM of 8GB. Vivo V23 5G comes up with internal storage of 256 GB and RAM of 12 GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 13 MP 1/3.1", 1.12µm f/2.2 (Wide Angle) and front camera of 13 MP 1/3.1", 1.12 µm f/2.2 (Wide Angle) whereas latter has primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.89, Main) + 8 MP (f/2.2, Wide Angle) + 2 MP (f/2.4) and front camera of 50 MP (f/2).
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Vs Vivo V23 5G
| Specifications | Samsung Galaxy A34 5G | Vivo V23 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android v13 | Android v12 |
| Screen Size | 6.6 inches | 6.44 inches |
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB / 8 GB |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 77 | 85 | |
| OS | Android v13 | Android v12 | |
| Screen Size | 6.6 inches | 6.44 inches | |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 5G | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB / 8 GB | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB | |
GENERAL | |||
| Colours | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver | Diamond Flare, Roman Black | |
| Custom UI | One UI 5.1 | ||
| Device type | smartphone | Smartphone | |
| Operating System | Android v13 | Android v12 | |
| Sim | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM (Hybrid Slot) | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
- Vivo V23 5G
DESIGN | |||
| Weight | 199 g | 179 g | |
| Width | 199 g | ||
DISPLAY | |||
| Aspect Ratio | 20:09 | 20:09 | |
| Pixel Density | ~390 PPI | 409 ppi | |
| Screen size | 6.6 inches | 6.44 inches | |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes, with Multitouch | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| CPU | 2.6 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 2.5 GHz, Octa Core Processor | |
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB / 8 GB | |
STORAGE | |||
| Card Slot | Yes, (Hybrid Slot), upto 1 TB | Yes | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB | |
CAMERA | |||
| Front Camera | 13 MP 1/3.1", 1.12 µm f/2.2 (Wide Angle) | 50 MP (f/2) | |
| Primary camera | 13 MP 1/3.1", 1.12µm f/2.2 (Wide Angle) | 64 MP (f/1.89, Main) + 8 MP (f/2.2, Wide Angle) + 2 MP (f/2.4) | |
| Video Recording | MP4, M4V, 3GP, 3G2, AVI, FLV, MKV, WEBM | 4K, 1080p | |
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | Yes | 3.5mm Headphone Jack | |
| Audio Player | Yes | AAC, OGG, FLAC, WAV, APE, MP3, MP2, MP1, OPUS, M4A | |
| FM Radio | No | Yes | |
| Video Player | Yes | MP4, 3GP, AVI, FLV, MKV | |
BATTERY | |||
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-removable Li-Po 4200 mAh battery | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.3, A2DP, LE | Yes, v5.2 | |
| Browser | Yes | HTML5 | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, BEIDOU, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v2.0 | Yes, USB-C | |
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 3G | Yes | Yes | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes | |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | Yes, In Display | |
| Other Features | Dust and splash resistant | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyro, Compass | Ambient Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, E-compass, Gyroscope, | |
Pros and Cons | ||
| Pros |
| |
| Cons |
| |
Similiar Comparisions
- Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
- Vivo V23 5G
Popular Mobile
- Under 12K
- 12-25K
- 25-50K
- Above 50K
Detailed Comparison of Samsung Galaxy A34 5G vs Vivo V23 5G
Camera Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A34 5G vs Vivo V23 5G
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G comes up with primary camera of 13 MP 1/3.1", 1.12µm f/2.2 (Wide Angle) whereas Vivo V23 5G comes up with 64 MP (f/1.89, Main) + 8 MP (f/2.2, Wide Angle) + 2 MP (f/2.4). Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include undefined.