Popular Products
Compare Samsung Galaxy F42 5G Vs Vivo X50 Pro
Should you buy Samsung Galaxy F42 5G or Vivo X50 Pro? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in Bangladesh, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Samsung Galaxy F42 5G starts at BDT 23,614 and Vivo X50 Pro starts at BDT 63,346.
Samsung Galaxy F42 5G has screen size of 6.6 inches and Vivo X50 Pro has screen size of 6.56 inches . Samsung Galaxy F42 5G comes up with internal storage of 128 GB and RAM of 8 GB. Vivo X50 Pro comes up with internal storage of 128 GB/256 GB and RAM of 8 GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.8) and front camera of 8 MP (f/2) whereas latter has primary camera of 48 MP (f/1.6) + 8 MP (f/2.2 and front camera of 32 MP (f/2.5) Camera.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Samsung Galaxy F42 5G Vs Vivo X50 Pro
| Specifications | Samsung Galaxy F42 5G | Vivo X50 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android v11 | Android OS, 10 |
| Screen Size | 6.6 inches | 6.56 inches |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 5G | Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G (7 nm) |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 80 | 86 | |
| OS | Android v11 | Android OS, 10 | |
| Screen Size | 6.6 inches | 6.56 inches | |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 5G | Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G (7 nm) | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB/256 GB | ||
GENERAL | |||
| Device type | Smartphone | Phablet | |
| Operating System | Android v11 | Android OS, 10 | |
| Sim | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Samsung Galaxy F42 5G
- Vivo X50 Pro
DESIGN | |||
| Height | 167.2 mm | 158.5 mm | |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8 mm | |
| Weight | 203 g | 181.5 g | |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 72.8 mm | |
DISPLAY | |||
| Aspect Ratio | 20:09 | 398 | |
| Bezel Less Display | Yes, Water Drop Notch | ||
| Form Factor | Touch | Touch | |
| Pixel Density | 352 ppi | ||
| Refresh Rate | 90 Hz | ||
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels | 1080 x 2376 pixels | |
| Screen size | 6.6 inches | 6.56 inches | |
| Technology | TFT | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes, with Multitouch | Capacitive Touchscreen | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 5G | Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G (7 nm) | |
| CPU | 2.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 620 | |
STORAGE | |||
| Call Records | Yes | ||
| Card Slot | Yes | ||
| External Storage | upto 1 TB | ||
| Messaging | Yes | ||
| Phonebook | Yes | ||
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | Night Mode, Depth and Macro | Geo Tagging, HDR, Panorama, 4k | |
| Front Camera | 8 MP (f/2) | 32 MP (f/2.5) Camera | |
| Primary camera | 64 MP (f/1.8) | 48 MP (f/1.6) + 8 MP (f/2.2 | |
| Video Recording | 1080p | 1080p@30fps | |
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | Yes | USB Type-C | |
| Audio Player | Yes | AAC, AAC+, MIDI, WAV, eAAC+, MP3, WMA | |
| FM Radio | Yes | ||
| Games | Yes | Yes | |
| Speakers | Yes | Yes | |
| Video Player | Yes | MPEG4, H.263, H.264, HD | |
BATTERY | |||
| Capacity | Non-removable Li-Po 5000 mAh battery | Non-removable Li-Ion 4315 mAh battery | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.0 | v5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | |
| Browser | HTML5 | HTML5 | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | yes with A-GPS, Glonass | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (CA) 5G | HSPA, LTE | |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v2.0 | Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go | |
| WLAN | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | Yes | Yes | |
| 3G | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz | Yes | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| AI Camera | Yes | ||
| Face Unlock | Yes | ||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side | Yes, In-Display | |
| Quick Charging | 15W Fast Charging | Yes, 33W | |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Light Sensor, Proximity Sensor | In-Display Fingerprint Sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | |
Similiar Comparisions
- Samsung Galaxy F42 5G
- Vivo X50 Pro
Popular Mobile
- Under 12K
- 12-25K
- 25-50K
- Above 50K
Detailed Comparison of Samsung Galaxy F42 5G vs Vivo X50 Pro
Design Comparison: Samsung Galaxy F42 5G vs Vivo X50 Pro
Samsung Galaxy F42 5G comes up with a weight of 203 g whereas Vivo X50 Pro weights around 181.5 g . Thickness of Samsung Galaxy F42 5G is 9 mm and the thickness of other mobiles is 8 mm.
Display Comparison: Samsung Galaxy F42 5G vs Vivo X50 Pro
Samsung Galaxy F42 5G has screen size of 6.6 inches whereas other comes up with 6.56 inches . Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 1080 x 2408 pixels and 1080 x 2376 pixels respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses TFT and latter uses undefined.
Camera Comparison: Samsung Galaxy F42 5G vs Vivo X50 Pro
Samsung Galaxy F42 5G comes up with primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.8) whereas Vivo X50 Pro comes up with 48 MP (f/1.6) + 8 MP (f/2.2. Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include Night Mode, Depth and Macro.
Performance Comparison: Samsung Galaxy F42 5G vs Vivo X50 Pro
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are MediaTek Dimensity 700 5G and Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G (7 nm) respectively. Samsung Galaxy F42 5G comes up Yes card slot and Vivo X50 Pro comes up with No card slot. CPU used in Samsung Galaxy F42 5G is 2.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor and used in Vivo X50 Pro is Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver).