Popular Products
Compare Samsung Galaxy M42 5G Vs Vivo Y73
Should you buy Samsung Galaxy M42 5G or Vivo Y73? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in Bangladesh, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Samsung Galaxy M42 5G starts at BDT 23,758 and Vivo Y73 starts at BDT 23,746.
Samsung Galaxy M42 5G has screen size of 6.6 inches and Vivo Y73 has screen size of 6.44 inches. Samsung Galaxy M42 5G comes up with internal storage of 128 GB and RAM of 8 GB. Vivo Y73 comes up with internal storage of 128 GB and RAM of 8 GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.8 and front camera of 32 MP (f/2.0 whereas latter has primary camera of 64 MP and front camera of 16 MP (f/2.0.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Samsung Galaxy M42 5G Vs Vivo Y73
| Specifications | Samsung Galaxy M42 5G | Vivo Y73 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android OS, v11 | Android 11 |
| Screen Size | 6.6 inches | 6.44 inches |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | MediaTek Helio G95 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 79 | 65 | |
| OS | Android OS, v11 | Android 11 | |
| Screen Size | 6.6 inches | 6.44 inches | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | MediaTek Helio G95 | |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB | |
GENERAL | |||
| Device type | Smartphone | ||
| Operating System | Android OS, v11 | Android 11 | |
| Sim | Dual Sim | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Samsung Galaxy M42 5G
- Vivo Y73
DESIGN | |||
| Height | 164.4 mm | ||
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 193 g (6.81 oz) | |
| Width | 75.9 mm | ||
DISPLAY | |||
| Aspect Ratio | 20:09 | ||
| Form Factor | Touch | ||
| Pixel Density | 266 ppi | 401 ppi density | |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | ||
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels | 1080 x 2460 pixels | |
| Screen size | 6.6 inches | 6.44 inches | |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED FHD+, HDR10 capacitive touchscreen, 16 Millions colors | |
| Touchscreen | Capacitive Touchscreen | ||
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | MediaTek Helio G95 | |
| CPU | 2.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G76 | |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB | |
STORAGE | |||
| Call Records | Yes | ||
| Card Slot | microSD Card | microSD | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB | |
| Messaging | Yes | ||
| Phonebook | Yes | ||
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | OIS, gyro-EIS, HDR, Panorama, AI Camera | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Front Camera | 32 MP (f/2.0 | 16 MP (f/2.0 | |
| Primary camera | 64 MP (f/1.8 | 64 MP | |
| Video Recording | 4k, 2160p@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | ||
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | Yes, USB Type-C Audio | ||
| Audio Player | WAV, AAC+, AC3, OGG, FLAC, WMA, MP3, AMR, AAC, MXMF, eAAC+ | ||
| FM Radio | Yes | ||
| Games | Yes | ||
| Speakers | Yes | ||
| Video Player | 3GP, ASF, M4V, H.263, H.264, MKV, 3G2, DivX, AVI, WMV, FLV, MPEG4 | ||
BATTERY | |||
| Capacity | Non-removable Li-Ion 6000 mAh battery | 4000 mAh | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | v5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE | |
| Browser | HTML5 | ||
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | A-GPS, GLONASS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | |
| USB | 3.1 Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB OTG | USB Type-C, USB On-The-Go | |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 ax, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | ||
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | Yes | Yes | |
| 3G | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Face Unlock | Yes | ||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | ||
| Quick Charging | Yes | Fast charging 33W | |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer | Fingerprint ( under-display), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
Similiar Comparisions
- Samsung Galaxy M42 5G
- Vivo Y73
Popular Mobile
- Under 12K
- 12-25K
- 25-50K
- Above 50K
Detailed Comparison of Samsung Galaxy M42 5G vs Vivo Y73
Design Comparison: Samsung Galaxy M42 5G vs Vivo Y73
Samsung Galaxy M42 5G comes up with a weight of 193 g whereas Vivo Y73 weights around 193 g (6.81 oz). Thickness of Samsung Galaxy M42 5G is 8.6 mm and the thickness of other mobiles is 8.5 mm.
Display Comparison: Samsung Galaxy M42 5G vs Vivo Y73
Samsung Galaxy M42 5G has screen size of 6.6 inches whereas other comes up with 6.44 inches. Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 720 x 1600 pixels and 1080 x 2460 pixels respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses AMOLED and latter uses AMOLED FHD+, HDR10 capacitive touchscreen, 16 Millions colors.
Camera Comparison: Samsung Galaxy M42 5G vs Vivo Y73
Samsung Galaxy M42 5G comes up with primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.8 whereas Vivo Y73 comes up with 64 MP. Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include OIS, gyro-EIS, HDR, Panorama, AI Camera.
Performance Comparison: Samsung Galaxy M42 5G vs Vivo Y73
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G and MediaTek Helio G95 respectively. Samsung Galaxy M42 5G comes up microSD Card card slot and Vivo Y73 comes up with microSD card slot. CPU used in Samsung Galaxy M42 5G is 2.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor and used in Vivo Y73 is Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55).