Popular Products
Compare Ulefone Armor 25 Vs IQOO 11 5G
Should you buy Ulefone Armor 25 or IQOO 11 5G? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in Bangladesh, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Ulefone Armor 25 starts at BDT 76,912 and IQOO 11 5G starts at BDT 79,198.
Ulefone Armor 25 has screen size of 6.8 inches and IQOO 11 5G has screen size of 6.78inches.IQOO 11 5G comes up with internal storage of 256GB and RAM of 8 GB.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Ulefone Armor 25 Vs IQOO 11 5G
| Specifications | Ulefone Armor 25 | IQOO 11 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 6.8 inches | 6.78inches |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen2 |
| RAM | 12GB | 8 GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 82 | ||
| OS | Android v13 | ||
| Screen Size | 6.8 inches | 6.78inches | |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen2 | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8 GB | |
| Internal Storage | 256GB | ||
GENERAL | |||
| Colours | Black | Alpha, Legend | |
| Sim | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Ulefone Armor 25
- IQOO 11 5G
DESIGN | |||
| Weight | 647 g (1.43 lb) | 205g | |
DISPLAY | |||
| Display Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
| Pixel Density | 396 ppi density | ~518PPI | |
| Refresh Rate | 144HZ | 144 Hz | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels | 1440x3200pixels, 144H | |
| Screen size | 6.8 inches | 6.78inches | |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen2 | |
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | 3.2GHz, Octa Core Processor | |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 740 | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8 GB | |
STORAGE | |||
| Card Slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No | |
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Sports, Night, Portrait, Photo, Video, 50MP, Panorama, Slow Motion, Time Lapse, Pro, Supermoon, Ultra HD Document, Long-Exposure Mode, Dual-View Video | |
| Front Camera | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm, 1080p@30fps | Punch Hole 16MP f/2.5 (Wide Angle) | |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K, 4K@30fps UHD, 1080p@30fps FHD | |
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | 3.5mm Jack Yes | No | |
| Speakers | Loudspeaker Yes | ||
| Video Player | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | Yes | |
BATTERY | |||
| Type | 22000 mAh | 5000 mAh, Li-Po Battery | |
| Stand By | N/A | ||
| Talk Time | N/A | ||
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | Yes, v5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | ||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | Yes, USB-C v2.0 | |
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | ||
| 3G | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | Yes | |
| 4G | LTE | Yes | |
| 5G | No | SA: n1/n3/n5/n8/n28/n40/n41/n77/n78, NSA: n28/n1/n3/n40/n41/n77/n78 | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Fingerprint (side-mounted) | Yes | |
| Quick Charging | 88W wired, 10W reverse wired | Yes, 120W Fast Charging | |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
Pros and Cons | ||
| Pros |
| |
| Cons |
| |
Similiar Comparisions
- IQOO 11 5G
Popular Mobile
- Under 12K
- 12-25K
- 25-50K
- Above 50K
Detailed Comparison of Ulefone Armor 25 vs IQOO 11 5G
Performance Comparison: Ulefone Armor 25 vs IQOO 11 5G
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen2 respectively. Ulefone Armor 25 comes up microSDXC (dedicated slot) card slot and IQOO 11 5G comes up with No card slot. CPU used in Ulefone Armor 25 is Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) and used in IQOO 11 5G is 3.2GHz, Octa Core Processor.