Popular Products
Compare Vivo X100 Ultra Vs ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro
Should you buy Vivo X100 Ultra or ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in Bangladesh, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Vivo X100 Ultra starts at BDT 99,064 and ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro starts at BDT 72,336.
Vivo X100 Ultra has screen size of 6.78 inches and ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro has screen size of 6.8 inches.ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro comes up with internal storage of 128GB / 256GB / 512GB and RAM of 12GB / 16GB / 18GB.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Vivo X100 Ultra Vs ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro
| Specifications | Vivo X100 Ultra | ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 6.78 inches | 6.8 inches |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 +Gen 2 |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB / 18GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| OS | Android 13 | ||
| Screen Size | 6.78 inches | 6.8 inches | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 +Gen 2 | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB / 18GB | |
| Internal Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | ||
GENERAL | |||
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Orange | Silver, Blue/Red | |
| Sim | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Vivo X100 Ultra
- ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro
DESIGN | |||
| Body Material | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | |
| Weight | 225 g (7.80 oz) | 215 g | |
DISPLAY | |||
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 ratio | 20:9 ratio | |
| Pixel Density | 453 ppi density | 387 ppi density | |
| Refresh Rate | 144HZ | ||
| Screen resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio | 1080 x 2400 pixel | |
| Screen size | 6.78 inches | 6.8 inches | |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes, with Multitouch | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 +Gen 2 | |
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 5x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 650 | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB / 18GB | |
STORAGE | |||
| Card Slot | No | No | |
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | ||
| Front Camera | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide),HDR,4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 32 MP (f/2.0, wide) + HDR | |
| Video Recording | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | |
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | 3.5mm Jack No | ||
| Speakers | Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers | ||
| Video Player | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | ||
BATTERY | |||
| Type | 5500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Stand By | N/A | No | |
| Talk Time | N/A | No | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, aptX, LE | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL | |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0, USB On-The-Go; accessory connector | |
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | Yes | |
| 3G | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | Yes | |
| 4G | LTE | Yes | |
| 5G | SA/NSA | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Yes | |
| Quick Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 18 min (advertised) | Fast charging 120W | |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
Popular Mobile
- Under 12K
- 12-25K
- 25-50K
- Above 50K
Detailed Comparison of Vivo X100 Ultra vs ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro
Performance Comparison: Vivo X100 Ultra vs ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 +Gen 2 respectively. Vivo X100 Ultra comes up No card slot and ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro comes up with No card slot. CPU used in Vivo X100 Ultra is Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 5x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) and used in ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9S Pro is Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510).