What is the difference between Apple A14 Bionic and Samsung Exynos 9611? Should you buy phone having Apple A14 Bionic or should go for Samsung Exynos 9611? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
Apple A14 Bionic has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 614956 and Samsung Exynos 9611 has AnTuTu score of 183257. Apple A14 Bionic comes up with 6 cores, 2990 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Samsung Exynos 9611 has 8 cores and 2300 MHz frequency.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
Specifications | A14 Bionic | Exynos 9611 |
---|---|---|
Total score | 614956 | 183257 |
Frequency | 2990 MHz | 2300 MHz |
Max size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Max display resolution | 2732 x 2048 | 2560 x 1600 |
AnTuTu Score | ||
CPU | 173864 | 55979 |
GPU | 208037 | 48708 |
Memory | 106696 | 43050 |
UX | 93575 | 38397 |
Total score | 614956 | 183257 |
Connectivity Features | ||
4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 12 |
5G support | Yes | No |
Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
Processor | 2x 2.99 GHz – Firestorm4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm | 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A734x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Cores | 6 | 8 |
Frequency | 2990 MHz | 2300 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8-A |
L3 cache | 8 MB | |
Process | 5 nanometers | 10 nanometers |
Transistor count | 11.8 billion | 3 billion |
TDP | 6 W | 8 W |
Geekbench Score | ||
Image compression | 174.85 Mpixels/s | 74.7 Mpixels/s |
Face detection | 33.7 images/s | 11.7 images/s |
Speech recognition | 95.65 words/s | 25 words/s |
Machine learning | 95.8 images/s | 17.7 images/s |
Camera shooting | 38.45 images/s | 8.82 images/s |
HTML 5 | 4.59 Mnodes/s | 1.24 Mnodes/s |
SQLite | 1060 Krows/s | 434 Krows/s |
Graphics | ||
GPU name | Apple GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 |
Execution units | 4 | 3 |
Memory Info | ||
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Max bandwidth | 42.7 Gbit/s | |
Max size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia | ||
Neural processor (NPU) | Neural Engine | No |
Storage type | NVMe | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
Max display resolution | 2732 x 2048 | 2560 x 1600 |
Video capture | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 120FPS |
Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 120FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9, Motion JPEG | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+ | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Apple A14 Bionic has been announced on September 2020 whereas Samsung Exynos 9611 has been announced on September 2019. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. A14 Bionic has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 614956 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 173864, 208037, 106696, 93575 respectively.
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. A14 Bionic comes up with the architecture of undefined and Exynos 9611 comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 6 core and 2990 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2300 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
First chipset has max size of 6 GB and Samsung Exynos 9611 has max size of 6 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
In terms of multimedia, A14 Bionic has Neural Engine NPU with storage type as NVMe and Exynos 9611 has No NPU and eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 storage type.