What is the difference between HiSilicon Kirin 650 and MediaTek Helio G95? Should you buy phone having HiSilicon Kirin 650 or should go for MediaTek Helio G95? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
HiSilicon Kirin 650 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 64887 and MediaTek Helio G95 has AnTuTu score of 302316. HiSilicon Kirin 650 comes up with 8 cores, 2000 MHz frequency and on the other hand, MediaTek Helio G95 has 8 cores and 2050 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, HiSilicon Kirin 650 has Mali-T830 MP2 GPU and Midgard architecture and latter MediaTek Helio G95 comes up with Mali-G76 3EEMC4 GPU and Bifrost architecture.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
Specifications | Kirin 650 | Helio G95 |
---|---|---|
Total score | 64887 | 302316 |
Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2050 MHz |
Max size | 4 GB | 10 GB |
Max display resolution | 1920 x 1200 | 2520 x 1080 |
AnTuTu Score | ||
Total score | 64887 | 302316 |
Connectivity Features | ||
4G support | LTE Cat. 6 | LTE Cat. 12 |
5G support | No | No |
Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
Upload speed | Up to 50 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 | 5 |
Bluetooth | 4.1 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
Processor | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A534x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2050 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Process | 16 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
Transistor count | 4 billion | |
TDP | 5 W | 5 W |
Geekbench Score | ||
Image compression | 62.4 Mpixels/s | |
Face detection | 8.63 images/s | |
Speech recognition | 14.6 words/s | |
Machine learning | 9.69 images/s | |
Camera shooting | 4.31 images/s | |
HTML 5 | 1.11 Mnodes/s | |
SQLite | 289.9 Krows/s |
Graphics | ||
GPU name | Mali-T830 MP2 | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 |
Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 900 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 4 |
Shading units | 32 | 64 |
FLOPS | 40 Gigaflops | 195.8 Gigaflops |
Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.1 |
OpenCL version | 1.2 | 2.0 |
DirectX version | 11 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 933 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Bus | 2x 32 Bit | 2x 32 Bit |
Max size | 4 GB | 10 GB |
Multimedia | ||
Neural processor (NPU) | No | Da Vinci |
Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
Max display resolution | 1920 x 1200 | 2520 x 1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 21MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Video capture | 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
Video playback | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
HiSilicon Kirin 650 has been announced on January 2016 whereas MediaTek Helio G95 has been announced on September 2020. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Kirin 650 comes up with the architecture of Midgard and Helio G95 comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 8 core and 2000 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2050 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
HiSilicon Kirin 650 has Mali-T830 MP2 GPU with GPU Frequency as 900 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. MediaTek Helio G95 has Mali-G76 3EEMC4 GPU with GPU Frequency as 900 MHz.
First chipset has max size of 4 GB and MediaTek Helio G95 has max size of 4 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
In terms of multimedia, Kirin 650 has No NPU with storage type as eMMC 5.1 and Helio G95 has Da Vinci NPU and eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 storage type.