Compare MediaTek Dimensity 800U Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000

What is the difference between HiSilicon Kirin 9000 and MediaTek Dimensity 800U? Should you buy phone having HiSilicon Kirin 9000 or should go for MediaTek Dimensity 800U? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.

HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 694127 and MediaTek Dimensity 800U has AnTuTu score of 323235. HiSilicon Kirin 9000 comes up with 8 cores, 3130 MHz frequency and on the other hand, MediaTek Dimensity 800U has 8 cores and 2400 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has Mali-G78 MP24 GPU and Valhall 2 architecture and latter MediaTek Dimensity 800U comes up with Mali-G57 MC3 GPU and Valhall architecture.

Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.

Kirin 9000 Vs Dimensity 800U

SpecificationsKirin 9000Dimensity 800U
Total score694127323235
Frequency3130 MHz2400 MHz
Max size16 GB12 GB
Max display resolution3840 x 21602520 x 1080
+ Read More- Read Less

Compare Chipsets

AnTuTu Score
CPU 189738106663
GPU 29133789658
Memory 11592465289
UX 8989265998
Total score 694127323235
Connectivity Features
Modem Balong 5000
4G support LTE Cat. 24LTE Cat. 18
5G support YesYes
Wi-Fi 65
Bluetooth 5.25.1
Performance
Processor 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A773x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A774x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A552x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 88
Frequency 3130 MHz2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-AARMv8-A
Process 5 nanometers7 nanometers
Transistor count 15.3 billion
TDP 6 W10 W
Graphics
GPU name Mali-G78 MP24Mali-G57 MC3
Architecture Valhall 2Valhall
Execution units 243
Shading units 38448
Vulkan version 1.11.1
OpenCL version 2.02.0
DirectX version 1212
Memory Info
Memory type LPDDR5LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2750 MHz2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s17.07 Gbit/s
Max size 16 GB12 GB
Multimedia
Neural processor (NPU) AI acceleratorYes
Storage type UFS 3.1UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 3840 x 21602520 x 1080
Video capture 4K at 60FPS4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS4K at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9H.264, H.265, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAVAAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Game Performance
PUBG Mobile 81 FPS [Ultra]44 FPS [Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 44 FPS [Ultra]47 FPS [Medium]
Fortnite 29 FPS [Low]28 FPS [Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 51 FPS [Ultra]51 FPS [Ultra]
Genshin Impact 58 FPS [Ultra]35 FPS [Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS [Ultra]55 FPS [Ultra]
Device Huawei Mate 40 Pro 1344 x 3140Oppo Realme 7 5G 1080 x 2400

Browse Chipset By

Which Chipset would you prefer?

Vote
Total:10

Detailed Comparison of Kirin 9000 vs Dimensity 800U

HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has been announced on October 2020 whereas MediaTek Dimensity 800U has been announced on August 2020. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:

Benchmark Comparison: Kirin 9000 vs Dimensity 800U

Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Kirin 9000 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 694127 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 189738, 291337, 115924, 89892 respectively.

CPU Comparison: Kirin 9000 vs Dimensity 800U

CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Kirin 9000 comes up with the architecture of Valhall 2 and Dimensity 800U comes up with architecture of Valhall. Former one has 8 core and 3130 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2400 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.

Memory Comparison: Kirin 9000 vs Dimensity 800U

First chipset has max size of 16 GB and MediaTek Dimensity 800U has max size of 16 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.

Multimedia And Connectivity Comparison: Kirin 9000 vs Dimensity 800U

In terms of multimedia, Kirin 9000 has AI accelerator NPU with storage type as UFS 3.1 and Dimensity 800U has Yes NPU and UFS 2.2 storage type.

FAQs

Kirin 9000 has higher AnTuTu score at 694127 compare to Dimensity 800U with total AnTuTu score at 323235 only.
Kirin 9000 has a higher base frequency of 3130 MHz compared to Dimensity 800U with 2400 MHz base frequency.
Kirin 9000 with 44 Gbit/s bandwidth is better than Dimensity 800U with 17.07 Gbit/s bandwidth.
Both Dimensity 800U and Kirin 9000 have same cores value of 8 cores.
Best phones having Kirin 9000 are Huawei Mate 40 Pro, Huawei P50, Huawei Mate 50 Pro 5G.
Best phones having Dimensity 800U are Vivo V21 5G, OPPO F19 Pro Plus 5G, Motorola Edge 20 Fusion.

Popular Mobile Chipset Brands

Recent News