Popular Products
Compare MediaTek Dimensity 800U Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
What is the difference between HiSilicon Kirin 9000 and MediaTek Dimensity 800U? Should you buy phone having HiSilicon Kirin 9000 or should go for MediaTek Dimensity 800U? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 694127 and MediaTek Dimensity 800U has AnTuTu score of 323235. HiSilicon Kirin 9000 comes up with 8 cores, 3130 MHz frequency and on the other hand, MediaTek Dimensity 800U has 8 cores and 2400 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has Mali-G78 MP24 GPU and Valhall 2 architecture and latter MediaTek Dimensity 800U comes up with Mali-G57 MC3 GPU and Valhall architecture.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
Kirin 9000 Vs Dimensity 800U
| Specifications | Kirin 9000 | Dimensity 800U |
|---|---|---|
| Total score | 694127 | 323235 |
| Frequency | 3130 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Max size | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
Compare Chipsets
AnTuTu Score | ||
| CPU | 189738 | 106663 |
| GPU | 291337 | 89658 |
| Memory | 115924 | 65289 |
| UX | 89892 | 65998 |
| Total score | 694127 | 323235 |
Chipset Mobile Phones
- Kirin 9000
- Dimensity 800U
Connectivity Features | ||
| Modem | Balong 5000 | |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
Performance | ||
| Processor | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A773x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A774x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3130 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Process | 5 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 15.3 billion | |
| TDP | 6 W | 10 W |
Graphics | ||
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| Architecture | Valhall 2 | Valhall |
| Execution units | 24 | 3 |
| Shading units | 384 | 48 |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 44 Gbit/s | 17.07 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia | ||
| Neural processor (NPU) | AI accelerator | Yes |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Video capture | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC |
Game Performance | ||
| PUBG Mobile | 81 FPS [Ultra] | 44 FPS [Ultra] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 44 FPS [Ultra] | 47 FPS [Medium] |
| Fortnite | 29 FPS [Low] | 28 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 51 FPS [Ultra] | 51 FPS [Ultra] |
| Genshin Impact | 58 FPS [Ultra] | 35 FPS [Low] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 60 FPS [Ultra] | 55 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | Huawei Mate 40 Pro 1344 x 3140 | Oppo Realme 7 5G 1080 x 2400 |
Browse Chipset By
- Popular Chipset
- Upcoming Chipset
Which Chipset would you prefer?
Similar Comparison
- Kirin 9000
- Dimensity 800U
Popular Mobiles
- Under 10K
- 10-20K
- 20-40K
- Above 40K
Detailed Comparison of Kirin 9000 vs Dimensity 800U
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has been announced on October 2020 whereas MediaTek Dimensity 800U has been announced on August 2020. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Benchmark Comparison: Kirin 9000 vs Dimensity 800U
Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Kirin 9000 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 694127 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 189738, 291337, 115924, 89892 respectively.
CPU Comparison: Kirin 9000 vs Dimensity 800U
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Kirin 9000 comes up with the architecture of Valhall 2 and Dimensity 800U comes up with architecture of Valhall. Former one has 8 core and 3130 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2400 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
Memory Comparison: Kirin 9000 vs Dimensity 800U
First chipset has max size of 16 GB and MediaTek Dimensity 800U has max size of 16 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
Multimedia And Connectivity Comparison: Kirin 9000 vs Dimensity 800U
In terms of multimedia, Kirin 9000 has AI accelerator NPU with storage type as UFS 3.1 and Dimensity 800U has Yes NPU and UFS 2.2 storage type.
