What is the difference between HiSilicon Kirin 985 and MediaTek Helio G90T? Should you buy phone having HiSilicon Kirin 985 or should go for MediaTek Helio G90T? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
HiSilicon Kirin 985 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 424840 and MediaTek Helio G90T has AnTuTu score of 283689. HiSilicon Kirin 985 comes up with 8 cores, 2580 MHz frequency and on the other hand, MediaTek Helio G90T has 8 cores and 2050 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, HiSilicon Kirin 985 has Mali-G77 MP8 GPU and Valhall architecture and latter MediaTek Helio G90T comes up with Mali-G76MC4 GPU and Bifrost architecture.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
Specifications | Kirin 985 | Helio G90T |
---|---|---|
Total score | 424840 | 283689 |
Frequency | 2580 MHz | 2050 MHz |
Max size | 12 GB | 10 GB |
Max display resolution | 3120 x 1440 | 2520 x 1080 |
AnTuTu Score | ||
CPU | 139377 | 97777 |
GPU | 133940 | 79772 |
Memory | 77188 | 57178 |
UX | 66447 | 45700 |
Total score | 424840 | 283689 |
Connectivity Features | ||
Modem | Balong 5000 | |
4G support | LTE Cat. 22 | LTE Cat. 12 |
5G support | Yes | No |
Download speed | Up to 1277 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
Upload speed | Up to 177 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
Processor | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A763x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A764x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Frequency | 2580 MHz | 2050 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Process | 7 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
TDP | 6 W | 5 W |
Graphics | ||
GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G76MC4 |
Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 4 |
Shading units | 128 | 64 |
FLOPS | 652 Gigaflops | 184 Gigaflops |
Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 32 Bit |
Max bandwidth | 34.1 Gbit/s | |
Max size | 12 GB | 10 GB |
Multimedia | ||
Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Da Vinci |
Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
Max display resolution | 3120 x 1440 | 2520 x 1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265 |
Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
HiSilicon Kirin 985 has been announced on April 2020 whereas MediaTek Helio G90T has been announced on July 2019. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Kirin 985 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 424840 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 139377, 133940, 77188, 66447 respectively.
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Kirin 985 comes up with the architecture of Valhall and Helio G90T comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 8 core and 2580 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2050 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
HiSilicon Kirin 985 has Mali-G77 MP8 GPU with GPU Frequency as 850 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. MediaTek Helio G90T has Mali-G76MC4 GPU with GPU Frequency as 800 MHz.
First chipset has max size of 12 GB and MediaTek Helio G90T has max size of 12 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
In terms of multimedia, Kirin 985 has Yes NPU with storage type as UFS 2.1 and Helio G90T has Da Vinci NPU and eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 storage type.