Popular Products
Compare Nokia C22 Vs Vivo Y22
Should you buy Nokia C22 or Vivo Y22? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in India, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Nokia C22 starts at ₹ 7,436 and Vivo Y22 starts at ₹ 6,990.
Nokia C22 has screen size of 6.52 inches and Vivo Y22 has screen size of 6.51 inches. Nokia C22 comes up with internal storage of 64 GB and RAM of 3GB / 4GB. Vivo Y22 comes up with internal storage of 128 GB and RAM of 6 GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 8 MP and front camera of 5 MP whereas latter has primary camera of 13 MP (f/1.8 and front camera of 8 MP (wide).
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Nokia C22 Vs Vivo Y22
| Specifications | Nokia C22 | Vivo Y22 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Screen Size | 6.52 inches | 6.51 inches |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Internal Storage | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 52 | 72 | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11 | |
| Screen Size | 6.52 inches | 6.51 inches | |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | ||
| Internal Storage | 64 GB | 64 GB | |
GENERAL | |||
| Colours | Dark Blue, Warm Gray | Obsidian Black, Dawn White | |
| Custom UI | N/A | ||
| Device type | Smartphone | ||
| Operating System | Android 12 | Android 11 | |
| Sim | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Nokia C22
- Vivo Y22
DESIGN | |||
| Body Material | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | |
| Height | 169.9 mm | ||
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 192.3 g (6.77 oz) | |
| Width | 77.9 mm | ||
DISPLAY | |||
| Aspect Ratio | 20:09 | ||
| Display Protection | N/A | ||
| Form Factor | N/A | ||
| Pixel Density | 269 ppi | 270 | |
| Refresh Rate | N/A | ||
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio | |
| Screen size | 6.52 inches | 6.51 inches | |
| Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors | |
| Touchscreen | Yes with multitouch | ||
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | |
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Adreno 610 | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | ||
STORAGE | |||
| Call Records | N/A | ||
| Card Slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | |
| External Storage | N/A | ||
| Internal Storage | 64 GB | 64 GB | |
| Messaging | Yes | ||
| Phonebook | Yes | ||
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR Panorama | |
| Front Camera | 5 MP | 8 MP (wide) | |
| Primary camera | 8 MP | 13 MP (f/1.8 | |
| Video Recording | 720p@30fps | ||
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | 3.5mm jack | ||
| Audio Player | Yes | ||
| FM Radio | Yes | ||
| Games | Yes | ||
| Speakers | Yes | ||
| Video Player | Yes | ||
BATTERY | |||
| Capacity | Li-Ion 4000 mAh battery | ||
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Browser | N/A | ||
| Edge | Yes | ||
| GPRS | Yes | ||
| GPS Facility | Yes, with A-GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | ||
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | Yes | Yes | |
| 3G | Yes | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| AI Camera | N/A | ||
| Face Unlock | N/A | ||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes | ||
| Quick Charging | No | Fast battery charging, 18W | |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | |
Pros and Cons | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Similiar Comparisions
- Nokia C22
- Vivo Y22
Popular Mobile
- Under 10K
- 10-20K
- 20-40K
- Above 40K
Detailed Comparison of Nokia C22 vs Vivo Y22
Design Comparison: Nokia C22 vs Vivo Y22
Nokia C22 comes up with a weight of 195 g whereas Vivo Y22 weights around 192.3 g (6.77 oz). Thickness of Nokia C22 is 8.8 mm and the thickness of other mobiles is 8.4 mm.
Display Comparison: Nokia C22 vs Vivo Y22
Nokia C22 has screen size of 6.52 inches whereas other comes up with 6.51 inches. Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 720 x 1600 pixels and 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses IPS LCD and latter uses IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors.
Camera Comparison: Nokia C22 vs Vivo Y22
Nokia C22 comes up with primary camera of 8 MP whereas Vivo Y22 comes up with 13 MP (f/1.8. Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include LED flash, HDR.
Performance Comparison: Nokia C22 vs Vivo Y22
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are Unisoc SC9863A and Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) respectively. Nokia C22 comes up microSDXC (dedicated slot) card slot and Vivo Y22 comes up with microSDXC (dedicated slot) card slot. CPU used in Nokia C22 is Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) and used in Vivo Y22 is Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240).