Popular Products
Compare Vivo X200 Vs Zte Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro Plus
Should you buy Vivo X200 or Zte Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro Plus? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in India, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Vivo X200 starts at ₹ 41,663 and Zte Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro Plus starts at ₹ 60,999.
Vivo X200 has screen size of 6.8 inches and Zte Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro Plus has screen size of 6.8 inches.Zte Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro Plus comes up with internal storage of 256GB / 512GB / 1TB and RAM of 12GB / 16GB.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Vivo X200 Vs Zte Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro Plus
| Specifications | Vivo X200 | Zte Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550 Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| OS | Android 13 | ||
| Screen Size | 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches | |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550 Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Internal Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | ||
GENERAL | |||
| Sim | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Vivo X200
- Zte Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro Plus
DESIGN | |||
| Weight | 206 g (7.13 oz) | 230 g | |
DISPLAY | |||
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 ratio | 20:9 ratio | |
| Pixel Density | 453 ppi density | 400 ppi | |
| Refresh Rate | 144HZ | 120 Hz | |
| Screen resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio | 1116 x 2480 pixels | |
| Screen size | 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches | |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes, multitouch | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550 Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | |
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Adreno 740 | |
| GPU | Immortalis-G730 MC12 | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A5 | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
STORAGE | |||
| Card Slot | No | No | |
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Front Camera | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), HDR, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 16 MP, (wide), under display, HDR, 1080p@30/60fps | |
| Video Recording | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, Cinematic mode (1080p) | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | |
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | 3.5mm Jack No | Yes, 3.5 mm | |
| Speakers | Loudspeaker Yes | Yes, Loudspeaker with stereo speakers | |
| Video Player | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, Cinematic mode (1080p) | ||
BATTERY | |||
| Type | 5200mAh | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, Non-Removable Battery | |
| Stand By | N/A | No | |
| Talk Time | N/A | No | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | ||
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2, CDMA 800 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| 3G | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100, CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| 4G | LTE | LTE | |
| 5G | SA/NSA | SA/NSA | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Fingerprint (under display, optical) | ||
| Quick Charging | 120W wired, 1-50% in 11 min (advertised), Reverse wired | 165W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 14 min | |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
Popular Mobile
- Under 10K
- 10-20K
- 20-40K
- Above 40K
Detailed Comparison of Vivo X200 vs Zte Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro Plus
Performance Comparison: Vivo X200 vs Zte Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro Plus
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (4 nm) and Qualcomm SM8550 Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) respectively. Vivo X200 comes up No card slot and Zte Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro Plus comes up with No card slot. CPU used in Vivo X200 is Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) and used in Zte Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro Plus is Adreno 740.