Popular Products
Compare Vivo X90 Vs Motorola Razr 50
Should you buy Vivo X90 or Motorola Razr 50? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in India, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Vivo X90 starts at ₹ 62,000 and Motorola Razr 50 starts at ₹ 64,999.
Vivo X90 has screen size of 6.56 inches and Motorola Razr 50 has screen size of 6.9 inches. Vivo X90 comes up with internal storage of 128 GB/256 GB and RAM of 12 GB. Motorola Razr 50 comes up with internal storage of 256 GB and RAM of 8 GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 40 MP (wide) + 12 MP (f/1.8 telephoto) + 12 MP (ultrawide) + 12 MP and front camera of 32 MP (f/2.5 whereas latter has primary camera of 64 MP 0.7m, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS f/1.7 (Wide Angle) 13 MP 120, 1/3", 1.12m, AF f/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 2 MP (Depth Sensor) with autofocus and front camera of Punch Hole 32P 0.7µm f/2.45 (Wide Angle).
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Vivo X90 Vs Motorola Razr 50
| Specifications | Vivo X90 | Motorola Razr 50 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android v13 | Android v13 |
| Screen Size | 6.56 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Chipset | Exynos 2100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen2 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB/256 GB | 128 GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 80 | 74 | |
| OS | Android v13 | Android v13 | |
| Screen Size | 6.56 inches | 6.9 inches | |
| Chipset | Exynos 2100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen2 | |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB/256 GB | 128 GB | |
GENERAL | |||
| Colours | Blue; other colours | Sage Green, Vanilla Cream, Summer Lilac | |
| Device type | Smartphone | Smartphone | |
| Operating System | Android v13 | Android v13 | |
| Sim | Dual SIM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Vivo X90
- Motorola Razr 50
DESIGN | |||
| Height | 160.1 mm | ||
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 188.6 g | |
| Width | 75.4 mm | ||
DISPLAY | |||
| Bezel Less Display | Yes, Punch Hole | ||
| Form Factor | touch | ||
| Pixel Density | 398 ppi | 413 ppi density | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels | 1080 x 2640 pixels | |
| Screen size | 6.56 inches | 6.9 inches | |
| Technology | Super AMOLED | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes, with Multi touch | Yes | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Exynos 2100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen2 | |
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.9 GHz & 3x2.8 GHz & 4x2.2 GHz) | 2.91 GHz, Octa Core Processor | |
| GPU | Mali-G78 | Adreno 725 | |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB | |
STORAGE | |||
| Call Records | Yes | ||
| Card Slot | No | No | |
| External Storage | Yes | ||
| Internal Storage | 128 GB/256 GB | 128 GB | |
| Messaging | Yes | ||
| Phonebook | Yes | ||
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | panorama, HDR | |
| Front Camera | 32 MP (f/2.5 | Punch Hole 32P 0.7µm f/2.45 (Wide Angle) | |
| Primary camera | 40 MP (wide) + 12 MP (f/1.8 telephoto) + 12 MP (ultrawide) + 12 MP | 64 MP 0.7m, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS f/1.7 (Wide Angle) 13 MP 120, 1/3", 1.12m, AF f/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 2 MP (Depth Sensor) with autofocus | |
| Video Recording | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | |
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | 3.5mm Audio Jeck | No | |
| Audio Player | Yes | ||
| FM Radio | Yes | No | |
| Games | Yes | ||
| Speakers | Yes | Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers | |
| Video Player | Yes | ||
BATTERY | |||
| Capacity | Non-Removable Li-Po 5000 mAh Battery | 4201 mAh | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes, v5.3 | |
| Browser | HTML5 | Yes, supports HTML5 | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | Yes, USB-C v2.0 | |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | ||
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | Yes | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| 3G | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | Yes | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes | |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes | Yes, Side | |
| Quick Charging | Fast charging 44W | Yes, 44W Rapid Charging | |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) | |
Pros and Cons | ||
| Pros |
| |
| Cons |
| |
Similiar Comparisions
- Vivo X90
- Motorola Razr 50
Popular Mobile
- Under 10K
- 10-20K
- 20-40K
- Above 40K
Detailed Comparison of Vivo X90 vs Motorola Razr 50
Display Comparison: Vivo X90 vs Motorola Razr 50
Vivo X90 has screen size of 6.56 inches whereas other comes up with 6.9 inches. Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 1080 x 2376 pixels and 1080 x 2640 pixels respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses Super AMOLED and latter uses undefined.
Camera Comparison: Vivo X90 vs Motorola Razr 50
Vivo X90 comes up with primary camera of 40 MP (wide) + 12 MP (f/1.8 telephoto) + 12 MP (ultrawide) + 12 MP whereas Motorola Razr 50 comes up with 64 MP 0.7m, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS f/1.7 (Wide Angle) 13 MP 120, 1/3", 1.12m, AF f/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 2 MP (Depth Sensor) with autofocus. Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama.
Performance Comparison: Vivo X90 vs Motorola Razr 50
Chipset, one of the important feature of the mobiles used in these Mobiles are Exynos 2100 (5 nm) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen2 respectively. Vivo X90 comes up No card slot and Motorola Razr 50 comes up with No card slot. CPU used in Vivo X90 is Octa-core (1x2.9 GHz & 3x2.8 GHz & 4x2.2 GHz) and used in Motorola Razr 50 is 2.91 GHz, Octa Core Processor.