What is the difference between HiSilicon Kirin 650 and MediaTek Helio G85? Should you buy phone having HiSilicon Kirin 650 or should go for MediaTek Helio G85? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
HiSilicon Kirin 650 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 64887 and MediaTek Helio G85 has AnTuTu score of 197484. HiSilicon Kirin 650 comes up with 8 cores, 2000 MHz frequency and on the other hand, MediaTek Helio G85 has 8 cores and 2000 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, HiSilicon Kirin 650 has Mali-T830 MP2 GPU and Midgard architecture and latter MediaTek Helio G85 comes up with Mali-G52 MP2 GPU and Bifrost architecture.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
Specifications | Kirin 650 | Helio G85 |
---|---|---|
Total score | 64887 | 197484 |
Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Max size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Max display resolution | 1920 x 1200 | 2520 x 1080 |
AnTuTu Score | ||
Total score | 64887 | 197484 |
Connectivity Features | ||
4G support | LTE Cat. 6 | LTE Cat. 7 |
5G support | No | No |
Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
Upload speed | Up to 50 Mbps | Up to 100 Mbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 | 5 |
Bluetooth | 4.1 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
Processor | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A534x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Process | 16 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
Transistor count | 4 billion | |
TDP | 5 W | 5 W |
Geekbench Score | ||
Image compression | 62.4 Mpixels/s | 80.9 Mpixels/s |
Face detection | 8.63 images/s | 11.9 images/s |
Speech recognition | 14.6 words/s | 24.2 words/s |
Machine learning | 9.69 images/s | 18.5 images/s |
Camera shooting | 4.31 images/s | 9.29 images/s |
HTML 5 | 1.11 Mnodes/s | 1.55 Mnodes/s |
SQLite | 289.9 Krows/s | 407.8 Krows/s |
Graphics | ||
GPU name | Mali-T830 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 2 |
Shading units | 32 | 32 |
FLOPS | 40 Gigaflops | 54 Gigaflops |
Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.0 |
OpenCL version | 1.2 | 2.0 |
DirectX version | 11 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 933 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Bus | 2x 32 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
Max size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia | ||
Neural processor (NPU) | No | Neural Engine |
Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Max display resolution | 1920 x 1200 | 2520 x 1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 21MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
Video capture | 1K at 60FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
Video playback | 1080p at 60FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
HiSilicon Kirin 650 has been announced on January 2016 whereas MediaTek Helio G85 has been announced on April 2020. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Kirin 650 comes up with the architecture of Midgard and Helio G85 comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 8 core and 2000 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2000 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
HiSilicon Kirin 650 has Mali-T830 MP2 GPU with GPU Frequency as 900 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. MediaTek Helio G85 has Mali-G52 MP2 GPU with GPU Frequency as 1000 MHz.
First chipset has max size of 4 GB and MediaTek Helio G85 has max size of 4 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
In terms of multimedia, Kirin 650 has No NPU with storage type as eMMC 5.1 and Helio G85 has Neural Engine NPU and eMMC 5.1 storage type.