Popular Products
Compare MediaTek Helio G95 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
What is the difference between HiSilicon Kirin 980 and MediaTek Helio G95? Should you buy phone having HiSilicon Kirin 980 or should go for MediaTek Helio G95? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
HiSilicon Kirin 980 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 405274 and MediaTek Helio G95 has AnTuTu score of 302316. HiSilicon Kirin 980 comes up with 8 cores, 2600 MHz frequency and on the other hand, MediaTek Helio G95 has 8 cores and 2050 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, HiSilicon Kirin 980 has Mali G76 MP10 GPU and Bifrost architecture and latter MediaTek Helio G95 comes up with Mali-G76 3EEMC4 GPU and Bifrost architecture.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
Kirin 980 Vs Helio G95
| Specifications | Kirin 980 | Helio G95 |
|---|---|---|
| Total score | 405274 | 302316 |
| Frequency | 2600 MHz | 2050 MHz |
| Max size | 8 GB | 10 GB |
| Max display resolution | 3120 x 1440 | 2520 x 1080 |
Compare Chipsets
AnTuTu Score | ||
| CPU | 134572 | 97589 |
| GPU | 135339 | 86889 |
| Memory | 65549 | 56527 |
| UX | 67634 | 59351 |
| Total score | 405274 | 302316 |
Chipset Mobile Phones
- Kirin 980
- Helio G95
Connectivity Features | ||
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 21 | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 1400 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 200 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
| Processor | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A762x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A764x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2600 MHz | 2050 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 6.9 billion | |
| TDP | 6 W | 5 W |
Geekbench Score | ||
| Image compression | 123.8 Mpixels/s | |
| Face detection | 20.4 images/s | |
| Speech recognition | 47.2 words/s | |
| Machine learning | 47.4 images/s | |
| Camera shooting | 23.2 images/s | |
| HTML 5 | 2.39 Mnodes/s | |
| SQLite | 655 Krows/s | |
Graphics | ||
| GPU name | Mali G76 MP10 | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 |
| Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Execution units | 10 | 4 |
| Shading units | 160 | 64 |
| FLOPS | 691 Gigaflops | 195.8 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 32 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 31.78 Gbit/s | |
| Max size | 8 GB | 10 GB |
Multimedia | ||
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Da Vinci |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3120 x 1440 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Game Performance | ||
| PUBG Mobile | 56 FPS [Ultra] | 51 FPS [Low] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 39 FPS [Ultra] | 38 FPS [Ultra] |
| Fortnite | 28 FPS [High] | 27 FPS [Low] |
| Shadowgun Legends | 51 FPS [Ultra] | 57 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 60 FPS [Ultra] | 48 FPS [High] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 60 FPS [Ultra] | 52 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | Huawei Nova 5T 1080 x 2340 | Realme 7 1080 x 2400 |
Browse Chipset By
- Popular Chipset
- Upcoming Chipset
Which Chipset would you prefer?
Similar Comparison
- Kirin 980
- Helio G95
Popular Mobiles
- Under 25K
- 25-50K
- 50-1Lac
- Above 1Lac
Detailed Comparison of Kirin 980 vs Helio G95
HiSilicon Kirin 980 has been announced on August 2018 whereas MediaTek Helio G95 has been announced on September 2020. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Benchmark Comparison: Kirin 980 vs Helio G95
Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Kirin 980 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 405274 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 134572, 135339, 65549, 67634 respectively.
CPU Comparison: Kirin 980 vs Helio G95
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Kirin 980 comes up with the architecture of Bifrost and Helio G95 comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 8 core and 2600 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2050 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
Graphics Comparison: Kirin 980 vs Helio G95
HiSilicon Kirin 980 has Mali G76 MP10 GPU with GPU Frequency as 720 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. MediaTek Helio G95 has Mali-G76 3EEMC4 GPU with GPU Frequency as 900 MHz.
Memory Comparison: Kirin 980 vs Helio G95
First chipset has max size of 8 GB and MediaTek Helio G95 has max size of 8 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
Multimedia And Connectivity Comparison: Kirin 980 vs Helio G95
In terms of multimedia, Kirin 980 has Yes NPU with storage type as UFS 3.0 and Helio G95 has Da Vinci NPU and eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 storage type.
