Popular Products
Compare Samsung Exynos 9611 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G)
What is the difference between HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) and Samsung Exynos 9611? Should you buy phone having HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) or should go for Samsung Exynos 9611? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 436390 and Samsung Exynos 9611 has AnTuTu score of 183257. HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) comes up with 8 cores, 2860 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Samsung Exynos 9611 has 8 cores and 2300 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has Mali G76 MP16 GPU and Bifrost architecture and latter Samsung Exynos 9611 comes up with Mali-G72 MP3 GPU and Bifrost architecture.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
Kirin 990 (4G) Vs Exynos 9611
| Specifications | Kirin 990 (4G) | Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Total score | 436390 | 183257 |
| Frequency | 2860 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| Max size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Max display resolution | 3360 x 1440 | 2560 x 1600 |
Compare Chipsets
AnTuTu Score | ||
| CPU | 138017 | 55979 |
| GPU | 145170 | 48708 |
| Memory | 98516 | 43050 |
| UX | 55324 | 38397 |
| Total score | 436390 | 183257 |
Chipset Mobile Phones
- Exynos 9611
Connectivity Features | ||
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 21 | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 1400 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 200 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
| Processor | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A762x 2.09 GHz – Cortex-A764x 1.86 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A734x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2860 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 10 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 8 billion | 3 billion |
| TDP | 6 W | 8 W |
Geekbench Score | ||
| Image compression | 148.7 Mpixels/s | 74.7 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 23.9 images/s | 11.7 images/s |
| Speech recognition | 54.1 words/s | 25 words/s |
| Machine learning | 55.8 images/s | 17.7 images/s |
| Camera shooting | 28.2 images/s | 8.82 images/s |
| HTML 5 | 3.13 Mnodes/s | 1.24 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | 797.5 Krows/s | 434 Krows/s |
Graphics | ||
| GPU name | Mali G76 MP16 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 16 | 3 |
| Shading units | 256 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 768 Gigaflops | 259 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 31.78 Gbit/s | |
| Max size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia | ||
| Neural processor (NPU) | Da Vinci | No |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3360 x 1440 | 2560 x 1600 |
| Video capture | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 120FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VC-1 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Game Performance | ||
| PUBG Mobile | 58 FPS [Ultra] | 31 FPS [High] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 41 FPS [Ultra] | 40 FPS [Medium] |
| Fortnite | 29 FPS [Ultra] | |
| Shadowgun Legends | 55 FPS [Ultra] | |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 60 FPS [Ultra] | 43 FPS [Ultra] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 60 FPS [Ultra] | 38 FPS [High] |
| Device | Huawei Mate 30 Pro 1146 x 2400 | Samsung Galaxy A51 1080 x 2400 |
Browse Chipset By
- Popular Chipset
- Upcoming Chipset
Which Chipset would you prefer?
Similar Comparison
- Kirin 990 (4G)
- Exynos 9611
Popular Mobiles
- Under 25K
- 25-50K
- 50-1Lac
- Above 1Lac
Detailed Comparison of Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9611
HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has been announced on October 2019 whereas Samsung Exynos 9611 has been announced on September 2019. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Benchmark Comparison: Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9611
Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Kirin 990 (4G) has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 436390 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 138017, 145170, 98516, 55324 respectively.
CPU Comparison: Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9611
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Kirin 990 (4G) comes up with the architecture of Bifrost and Exynos 9611 comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 8 core and 2860 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2300 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
Graphics Comparison: Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9611
HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has Mali G76 MP16 GPU with GPU Frequency as 600 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. Samsung Exynos 9611 has Mali-G72 MP3 GPU with GPU Frequency as 850 MHz.
Memory Comparison: Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9611
First chipset has max size of 12 GB and Samsung Exynos 9611 has max size of 12 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
Multimedia And Connectivity Comparison: Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9611
In terms of multimedia, Kirin 990 (4G) has Da Vinci NPU with storage type as UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 and Exynos 9611 has No NPU and eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 storage type.
