Popular Products
Compare Samsung Exynos 9825 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G)
What is the difference between HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) and Samsung Exynos 9825? Should you buy phone having HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) or should go for Samsung Exynos 9825? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 436390 and Samsung Exynos 9825 has AnTuTu score of 459787. HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) comes up with 8 cores, 2860 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Samsung Exynos 9825 has 8 cores and 2730 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has Mali G76 MP16 GPU and Bifrost architecture and latter Samsung Exynos 9825 comes up with Mali G76 MP12 GPU and Bifrost architecture.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
Kirin 990 (4G) Vs Exynos 9825
| Specifications | Kirin 990 (4G) | Exynos 9825 |
|---|---|---|
| Total score | 436390 | 459787 |
| Frequency | 2860 MHz | 2730 MHz |
| Max size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Max display resolution | 3360 x 1440 | 3840 x 2400 |
Compare Chipsets
AnTuTu Score | ||
| CPU | 138017 | 132299 |
| GPU | 145170 | 173903 |
| Memory | 98516 | 84417 |
| UX | 55324 | 65501 |
| Total score | 436390 | 459787 |
Chipset Mobile Phones
- Exynos 9825
Connectivity Features | ||
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 21 | LTE Cat. 20 |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 1400 Mbps | Up to 2000 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 200 Mbps | Up to 316 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
| Processor | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A762x 2.09 GHz – Cortex-A764x 1.86 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2.73 GHz – M42x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A754x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2860 MHz | 2730 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 8 billion | 8.5 billion |
| TDP | 6 W | 9 W |
Geekbench Score | ||
| Image compression | 148.7 Mpixels/s | |
| Face detection | 23.9 images/s | |
| Speech recognition | 54.1 words/s | |
| Machine learning | 55.8 images/s | |
| Camera shooting | 28.2 images/s | |
| HTML 5 | 3.13 Mnodes/s | |
| SQLite | 797.5 Krows/s | |
Graphics | ||
| GPU name | Mali G76 MP16 | Mali G76 MP12 |
| Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Execution units | 16 | 12 |
| Shading units | 256 | 192 |
| FLOPS | 768 Gigaflops | 943 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 31.78 Gbit/s | 31.1 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia | ||
| Neural processor (NPU) | Da Vinci | Yes |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 |
| Max display resolution | 3360 x 1440 | 3840 x 2400 |
| Video capture | 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 150FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VC-1 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Game Performance | ||
| PUBG Mobile | 58 FPS [Ultra] | |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 41 FPS [Ultra] | |
| Fortnite | 29 FPS [Ultra] | |
| Shadowgun Legends | 55 FPS [Ultra] | |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 60 FPS [Ultra] | |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 60 FPS [Ultra] | |
| Device | Huawei Mate 30 Pro 1146 x 2400 | |
Browse Chipset By
- Popular Chipset
- Upcoming Chipset
Which Chipset would you prefer?
Similar Comparison
- Kirin 990 (4G)
- Exynos 9825
Popular Mobiles
- Under 25K
- 25-50K
- 50-1Lac
- Above 1Lac
Detailed Comparison of Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9825
HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has been announced on October 2019 whereas Samsung Exynos 9825 has been announced on August 2019. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Benchmark Comparison: Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9825
Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Kirin 990 (4G) has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 436390 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 138017, 145170, 98516, 55324 respectively.
CPU Comparison: Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9825
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Kirin 990 (4G) comes up with the architecture of Bifrost and Exynos 9825 comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 8 core and 2860 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2730 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
Graphics Comparison: Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9825
HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has Mali G76 MP16 GPU with GPU Frequency as 600 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. Samsung Exynos 9825 has Mali G76 MP12 GPU with GPU Frequency as 600 MHz.
Memory Comparison: Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9825
First chipset has max size of 12 GB and Samsung Exynos 9825 has max size of 12 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
Multimedia And Connectivity Comparison: Kirin 990 (4G) vs Exynos 9825
In terms of multimedia, Kirin 990 (4G) has Da Vinci NPU with storage type as UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 and Exynos 9825 has Yes NPU and UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 storage type.
