What is the difference between Samsung Exynos 2100 and Apple A11 Bionic? Should you buy phone having Samsung Exynos 2100 or should go for Apple A11 Bionic? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
Samsung Exynos 2100 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 687807 and Apple A11 Bionic has AnTuTu score of 317306. Samsung Exynos 2100 comes up with 8 cores, 2900 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Apple A11 Bionic has 6 cores and 2390 MHz frequency.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
Specifications | Exynos 2100 | A11 Bionic |
---|---|---|
Total score | 687807 | 317306 |
Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2390 MHz |
Max size | 16 GB | 3 GB |
Max display resolution | 4096 x 2160 | 2436 x 1125 |
AnTuTu Score | ||
CPU | 198813 | 88563 |
GPU | 275313 | 75396 |
Memory | 123685 | 44020 |
UX | 87930 | 40315 |
Total score | 687807 | 317306 |
Connectivity Features | ||
4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 12 |
5G support | Yes | No |
Download speed | Up to 3000 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
Upload speed | Up to 422 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
Processor | 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-X13x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A784x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2.39 GHz – Monsoon4x 0 GHz – Mistral |
Cores | 8 | 6 |
Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2390 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8-A |
Process | 5 nanometers | 10 nanometers |
TDP | 9 W | 8 W |
Geekbench Score | ||
Image compression | 170.5 Mpixels/s | 128.4 Mpixels/s |
Face detection | 26.7 images/s | 21.9 images/s |
Speech recognition | 64.15 words/s | 45.2 words/s |
Machine learning | 51.35 images/s | 39.6 images/s |
Camera shooting | 33.9 images/s | 24.2 images/s |
HTML 5 | 3.21 Mnodes/s | 3.16 Mnodes/s |
SQLite | 970.15 Krows/s | 756.85 Krows/s |
Graphics | ||
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP14 | Apple GPU |
Architecture | Vallhall 2 | |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | |
Execution units | 14 | 3 |
Shading units | 224 | |
Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.0 |
OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.1 |
DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4 |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 14.9 Gbit/s |
Max size | 16 GB | 3 GB |
Multimedia | ||
Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Neural Engine |
Storage type | UFS 3.1 | NVMe |
Max display resolution | 4096 x 2160 | 2436 x 1125 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP | 2x 12MP |
Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
Video playback | 8K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG |
Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Samsung Exynos 2100 has been announced on December 2020 whereas Apple A11 Bionic has been announced on September 2017. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Exynos 2100 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 687807 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 198813, 275313, 123685, 87930 respectively.
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Exynos 2100 comes up with the architecture of Vallhall 2 and A11 Bionic comes up with architecture of undefined. Former one has 8 core and 2900 MHz frequency and latter has 6 cores and 2390 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
First chipset has max size of 16 GB and Apple A11 Bionic has max size of 16 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
In terms of multimedia, Exynos 2100 has Yes NPU with storage type as UFS 3.1 and A11 Bionic has Neural Engine NPU and NVMe storage type.