What is the difference between Samsung Exynos 7570 and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G)? Should you buy phone having Samsung Exynos 7570 or should go for HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G)? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
Samsung Exynos 7570 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 56511 and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has AnTuTu score of 436390. Samsung Exynos 7570 comes up with 4 cores, 1400 MHz frequency and on the other hand, HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has 8 cores and 2860 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, Samsung Exynos 7570 has Mali T-720 MP2 GPU and Midgard architecture and latter HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) comes up with Mali G76 MP16 GPU and Bifrost architecture.
Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets.
Specifications | Exynos 7570 | Kirin 990 (4G) |
---|---|---|
Total score | 56511 | 436390 |
Frequency | 1400 MHz | 2860 MHz |
Max size | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Max display resolution | 1363 x 1280 | 3360 x 1440 |
AnTuTu Score | ||
CPU | 26311 | 138017 |
Memory | 20220 | 98516 |
UX | 9577 | 55324 |
Total score | 56511 | 436390 |
Connectivity Features | ||
4G support | LTE Cat. 5 | LTE Cat. 21 |
5G support | No | No |
Download speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 1400 Mbps |
Upload speed | Up to 50 Mbps | Up to 200 Mbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 | 6 |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Performance | ||
Processor | 4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A762x 2.09 GHz – Cortex-A764x 1.86 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Cores | 4 | 8 |
Frequency | 1400 MHz | 2860 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Process | 14 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
Transistor count | 2 billion | 8 billion |
TDP | 4 W | 6 W |
Geekbench Score | ||
Image compression | 17.25 Mpixels/s | 148.7 Mpixels/s |
Face detection | 3.49 images/s | 23.9 images/s |
Speech recognition | 9.24 words/s | 54.1 words/s |
Machine learning | 4.51 images/s | 55.8 images/s |
Camera shooting | 1.99 images/s | 28.2 images/s |
HTML 5 | 0.4 Mnodes/s | 3.13 Mnodes/s |
SQLite | 107.7 Krows/s | 797.5 Krows/s |
Graphics | ||
GPU name | Mali T-720 MP2 | Mali G76 MP16 |
Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 16 |
Shading units | 16 | 256 |
FLOPS | 36 Gigaflops | 768 Gigaflops |
Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.0 |
OpenCL version | 1.2 | 2.0 |
DirectX version | 11 | 12 |
Memory Info | ||
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Bus | 1x 32 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
Max bandwidth | 7.46 Gbit/s | 31.78 Gbit/s |
Max size | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia | ||
Neural processor (NPU) | No | Da Vinci |
Storage type | eMMC 5.0 | UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 |
Max display resolution | 1363 x 1280 | 3360 x 1440 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 13MP | |
Video capture | 1K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
Video playback | 1080p at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265 | H.264, H.265, VC-1 |
Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Samsung Exynos 7570 has been announced on August 2016 whereas HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has been announced on October 2019. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Exynos 7570 comes up with the architecture of Midgard and Kirin 990 (4G) comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 4 core and 1400 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2860 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance.
Samsung Exynos 7570 has Mali T-720 MP2 GPU with GPU Frequency as 650 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has Mali G76 MP16 GPU with GPU Frequency as 600 MHz.
First chipset has max size of 4 GB and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) has max size of 4 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset.
In terms of multimedia, Exynos 7570 has No NPU with storage type as eMMC 5.0 and Kirin 990 (4G) has Da Vinci NPU and UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 storage type.