Popular Products
Compare Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g Vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Should you buy Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g or Samsung Galaxy M52 5G? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in Pakistan, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g starts at PKR 111,146 and Samsung Galaxy M52 5G starts at PKR 92,336.
Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g has screen size of 6.5 inches and Samsung Galaxy M52 5G has screen size of 6.7 inches. Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g comes up with internal storage of 128 GB and RAM of 8 GB. Samsung Galaxy M52 5G comes up with internal storage of 128 GB and RAM of 8 GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.7) and front camera of 32 MP (f/2.4) whereas latter has primary camera of 64 MP (Wide Angle) + 12 MP (Ultra Wide) + 5 MP (f/2.4) and front camera of Punch Hole 32 MP (f/2 with Screen Flash).
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g Vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
| Specifications | Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g | Samsung Galaxy M52 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android 11 | Android v11 |
| Screen Size | 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6889Z Dimensity 1000+ (7nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G |
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 84 | 85 | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android v11 | |
| Screen Size | 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches | |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6889Z Dimensity 1000+ (7nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | |
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | ||
GENERAL | |||
| Colours | Astral Blue, Starry Black | ||
| Custom UI | ColorOS 11.1 | ||
| Device type | Phablet | Smartphone | |
| Operating System | Android 11 | Android v11 | |
| Sim | Dual SIM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g
- Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
DESIGN | |||
| Body Material | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | ||
| Height | 159.7 mm | 164.6 mm | |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 173 g | 199 g | |
| Width | 73.2 mm | 76.3 mm | |
DISPLAY | |||
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | 20:09 | |
| Bezel Less Display | Yes, Punch-hole Display | Yes, Punch Hole | |
| Form Factor | Touch | Touch | |
| Pixel Density | 410 ppi | 393 ppi | |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz refresh rate | 120 Hz | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2408 pixels | |
| Screen size | 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches | |
| Technology | OLED | ||
| Touchscreen | Capacitive Touchscreen | Yes, with Multitouch | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6889Z Dimensity 1000+ (7nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | |
| CPU | Octa-core (4×A77 2.6GHz + 4×A55 2.0GHz) | 2.4 GHz, Octa Core Processor | |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 619 | |
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB | |
STORAGE | |||
| Internal Storage | 128 GB | ||
CAMERA | |||
| Camera Features | HDR, Panorama, EIS | Single Take, Ultra Wide, Macro, Depth and Night Mode, Video Features: Hyperlapse, Super Slow-motion | |
| Front Camera | 32 MP (f/2.4) | Punch Hole 32 MP (f/2 with Screen Flash) | |
| Primary camera | 64 MP (f/1.7) | 64 MP (Wide Angle) + 12 MP (Ultra Wide) + 5 MP (f/2.4) | |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 4K @ 30fps UHD, 1080p @ 30fps FHD | |
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | USB Type-C | Yes | |
| Audio Player | MP3, WAV, eAAC+, FLAC | MP3, M4A, 3GA, AAC, OGG, OGA, WAV, AMR, AWB, FLAC, MID, MIDI, XMF, MXMF, IMY, RTTTL, RTX, OTA | |
| Games | Yes | Yes | |
| Speakers | Yes | Yes | |
| Video Player | MP4, DivX, XviD, WMV, H.264, H.263 | MP4, M4V, 3GP, 3G2, AVI, FLV, MKV, WEBM | |
BATTERY | |||
| Capacity | Non-removable Li-Ion 4350 mAh battery | Non-removable Li-ion 5000 mAh battery | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | v5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | Yes, v5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Browser | HTML5 | HTML5 | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, GNSS | yes with A-GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo | |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (CA) 5G | |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, USB OTG | Yes, USB-C | |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ax/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | |
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | Yes | Yes | |
| 3G | Yes | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes | |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, Side | |
| Other Features | SuperVOOC 2.0 65W Quick Charging, NFC, Face Unlock | Torch | |
| Quick Charging | Yes, Supervooc2.065W | 25W Fast Charging | |
| Sensors | In-Display Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass | Accelerometer, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Light Sensor, Proximity Sensor | |
Similiar Comparisions
- Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g
- Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Popular Mobile
- Under 25K
- 25-50K
- 50-1Lac
- Above 1Lac
Detailed Comparison of Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Design Comparison: Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g comes up with a weight of 173 g whereas Samsung Galaxy M52 5G weights around 199 g. Thickness of Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g is 7.6 mm and the thickness of other mobiles is 7.4 mm.
Display Comparison: Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g has screen size of 6.5 inches whereas other comes up with 6.7 inches. Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 1080 x 2400 pixels and 1080 x 2408 pixels respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses undefined and latter uses TFT.
Camera Comparison: Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Oppo Reno 5 Pro 5g comes up with primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.7) whereas Samsung Galaxy M52 5G comes up with 64 MP (Wide Angle) + 12 MP (Ultra Wide) + 5 MP (f/2.4). Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include HDR, Panorama, EIS .