Popular Products
Compare Samsung Galaxy M92 Vs Samsung Galaxy F64 5G
Should you buy Samsung Galaxy M92 or Samsung Galaxy F64 5G? Well, your search ends here. Find out which mobile phone is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in Pakistan, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. Samsung Galaxy M92 starts at PKR 102,709 and Samsung Galaxy F64 5G starts at PKR 101,067.
Samsung Galaxy M92 has screen size of 6.7 inches and Samsung Galaxy F64 5G has screen size of 6.7 inches. Samsung Galaxy M92 comes up with internal storage of 128 GB/256 GB and RAM of 6 GB / 8 GB. Samsung Galaxy F64 5G comes up with internal storage of 128 GB/256 GB and RAM of 6 GB. Coming to the Camera, Former has primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.8 wide) + 12 MP (f/2.2 ultrawide) + 5 MP (f/2.4 and front camera of 32 MP whereas latter has primary camera of 64 MP and front camera of 32 MP (f/2.0.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
Samsung Galaxy M92 Vs Samsung Galaxy F64 5G
| Specifications | Samsung Galaxy M92 | Samsung Galaxy F64 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Screen Size | 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) |
| RAM | 6 GB / 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB/256 GB | 128 GB/256 GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11 | |
| Screen Size | 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) | |
| RAM | 6 GB / 8 GB | 6 GB | |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB/256 GB | 128 GB/256 GB | |
GENERAL | |||
| Device type | Smartphone | ||
| Operating System | Android 12 | Android 11 | |
| Sim | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Similiar Alternatives
- Samsung Galaxy M92
- Samsung Galaxy F64 5G
DESIGN | |||
| Body Material | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | |
| Height | 163.9 mm | ||
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 191g | |
| Width | 76.3 mm | ||
DISPLAY | |||
| Pixel Density | 393 ppi | 403 ppi density | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels | |
| Screen size | 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches | |
| Touchscreen | Super AMOLED Plus, 420 nits (peak) | ||
PERFORMANCE | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) | |
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670) | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4 & 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G76 MP12 | |
| RAM | 6 GB / 8 GB | 6 GB | |
STORAGE | |||
| Call Records | yes | ||
| Internal Storage | 128 GB/256 GB | 128 GB/256 GB | |
| Messaging | yes | ||
| Phonebook | yes | ||
CAMERA | |||
| Front Camera | 32 MP | 32 MP (f/2.0 | |
| Primary camera | 64 MP (f/1.8 wide) + 12 MP (f/2.2 ultrawide) + 5 MP (f/2.4 | 64 MP | |
| Video Recording | LED flash, panorama, HDR | ||
MULTIMEDIA | |||
| Audio Jack | Yes | ||
| Audio Player | Yes | ||
| FM Radio | Yes | ||
| Games | Yes | ||
| Speakers | Yes | ||
| Video Player | Yes | ||
BATTERY | |||
| Capacity | Non-Removable Li-Po 7000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
CONNECTIVITY | |||
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE | |
| Browser | HTML5 | ||
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| GPS Facility | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps, 5G | |
| USB | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | microUSB 2.0 Type C | |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | ||
NETWORK SUPPORT | |||
| 2G | Yes | Yes | |
| 3G | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | |
| 4G | Yes | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | Yes | |
MORE FEATURES | |||
| Quick Charging | Fast charging 25W | Fast charging 25W | |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
Popular Mobile
- Under 25K
- 25-50K
- 50-1Lac
- Above 1Lac
Detailed Comparison of Samsung Galaxy M92 vs Samsung Galaxy F64 5G
Design Comparison: Samsung Galaxy M92 vs Samsung Galaxy F64 5G
Samsung Galaxy M92 comes up with a weight of 218 g whereas Samsung Galaxy F64 5G weights around 191g. Thickness of Samsung Galaxy M92 is 9.5 mm and the thickness of other mobiles is 8.9 mm.
Display Comparison: Samsung Galaxy M92 vs Samsung Galaxy F64 5G
Samsung Galaxy M92 has screen size of 6.7 inches whereas other comes up with 6.7 inches. Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 1080 x 2400 pixels and 1080 x 2340 pixels respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses undefined and latter uses Super AMOLED, 420 nits (peak).
Camera Comparison: Samsung Galaxy M92 vs Samsung Galaxy F64 5G
Samsung Galaxy M92 comes up with primary camera of 64 MP (f/1.8 wide) + 12 MP (f/2.2 ultrawide) + 5 MP (f/2.4 whereas Samsung Galaxy F64 5G comes up with 64 MP. Some of the Camera Features for both the mobiles include undefined.