Popular Products
Compare iFFALCON by TCL 65H71 65-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart QLED TV Vs Samsung QN90A 55-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart Neo QLED TV QA55QN90AAKLXL
Should you buy iFFALCON by TCL 65H71 65-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart QLED TV or Samsung QN90A 55-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart Neo QLED TV QA55QN90AAKLXL? Well, your search ends here. Find out which TV is best for you - Compare the two models on the basis of their Price in India, Body, Display, Storage, Connectivity, Camera, and Performance. iFFALCON by TCL 65H71 65-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart QLED TV starts at ₹ 83,999 and Samsung QN90A 55-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart Neo QLED TV QA55QN90AAKLXL starts at ₹ 140,160.
iFFALCON by TCL 65H71 65-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart QLED TV has screen size of 65 in and Samsung QN90A 55-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart Neo QLED TV QA55QN90AAKLXL has screen size of 55 Inch. Former comes up with a great resolution of 4K, 3840 x 2160 pixels and a refresh rate of 120 Hz. latter comes up with a great resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels and a refresh rate of 60 Hz.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don't forget to check out expert opinion as well.
iFFALCON by TCL 65H71 65-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart QLED TV Vs Samsung QN90A 55-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart Neo QLED TV QA55QN90AAKLXL
| Specifications | iFFALCON by TCL 65H71 65-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart QLED TV | Samsung QN90A 55-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart Neo QLED TV QA55QN90AAKLXL |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Resolution | 4K, 3840 x 2160 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels |
| Total Speaker Output | 30 w | 60 W |
| HDMI Ports | 3 | 4 |
| Processor | Amlogic A55 | |
| Smart TV | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | 2 GB |
Compare Models
Summary | |||
| Specs Score | 81 | 85 | |
| Screen Resolution | 4K, 3840 x 2160 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | |
| Total Speaker Output | 30 w | 60 W | |
| HDMI Ports | 3 | 4 | |
| Processor | Amlogic A55 | ||
| Smart TV | Yes | Yes | |
| RAM | 2 GB | ||
General | |||
| Type | QLED | QLED | |
| Warranty | 1 Year | 1 Year | |
Similiar Alternatives
- iFFALCON by TCL 65H71 65-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart QLED TV
- Samsung QN90A 55-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart Neo QLED TV QA55QN90AAKLXL
Display | |||
| 3D TV | No | No | |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:09 | ||
| Curved TV | No | No | |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Screen Resolution | 4K, 3840 x 2160 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | |
| Touchscreen | No | No | |
Audio | |||
| Audio Formats Supported | MP3, WMA, AAC, AC3, AC4 | MP3, WAV, AC3 | |
| Number Of Speakers | 2 | 4 | |
| Other Audio Features | Dolby Audio MS 12 | ||
| Output Per Speaker | 15 w | 15 W | |
| Total Speaker Output | 30 w | 60 W | |
Video | |||
| Image Formats Supported | JPEG, PNG | JPEG, PNG | |
| Video Formats Supported | H.265, H.264, MPEG2/4, VC1, VP9 | MP4, WMV, AVI, FLV | |
Connectivity | |||
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes | |
| HDMI Ports | 3 | 4 | |
| USB Ports | 2 | 2 | |
Smart Tv | |||
| Apps Supported | Netflix, Disney+Hotstar, Youtube, etc. | Netflix, Amazon Prime, Sony Liv, Zee5, Youtube, etc. | |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes | |
| Other Smart Features | Android (Google Assistant & Chromecast in-built) | Tizen | |
| Processor | Amlogic A55 | ||
| Processor Cores | 4 | ||
| RAM | 2 GB | ||
| Smart TV | Yes | Yes | |
| Storage | 16 GB | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes | |
Power | |||
| Power Consumption | 230 w | ||
| Voltage Requirement | AC 100 - 240 V | AC 230 V | |
Remote Features | |||
| Internet Access In Remote | Yes | Yes | |
| Touch Controls On Remote | No | ||
Pros and Cons | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
| |
Similiar Comparisions
- iFFALCON by TCL 65H71 65-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart QLED TV
- Samsung QN90A 55-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart Neo QLED TV QA55QN90AAKLXL
Popular Tv
- Under 10K
- 10-20K
- 20-40K
- Above 40K
Detailed Comparison of iFFALCON by TCL 65H71 65-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart QLED TV vs Samsung QN90A 55-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart Neo QLED TV QA55QN90AAKLXL
Design Comparison: iFFALCON by TCL 65H71 65-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart QLED TV vs Samsung QN90A 55-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart Neo QLED TV QA55QN90AAKLXL
iFFALCON by TCL 65H71 65-inch Ultra HD 4K Smart QLED TV has comes up with a great resolution of 4K, 3840 x 2160 pixels and refresh rate of 60 Hz whereas latter has comes up with a great resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels and refresh rate of 120 Hz.