Categories
Comparison Featured Tablet

Redmi Pad SE Vs OPPO Pad Air Tablet Comparison: New-Gen Mid-Range Tablet For Daily Use

(Last Updated On: August 17, 2023)

Key Highlights

  • Redmi Pad SE debuted as the latest mid-range Android tablet from Xiaomi
  • Competes against the OPPO Pad Air tablet
  • Both tablets pack equivalent hardware for performance delivery

Xiaomi recently unveiled two new tablet including the Xiaomi Pad 6Max and the Redmi Pad SE. The former is targeted at the premium audience, while the latter has been introduced for the mid-range consumers. We already have witnessed multiple new tablet launches in the mid-tier segment out of which a few have emerged as a potent daily driver. While the Redmi Pad SE fits well in this category, it certainly has got some stiff competition out there. The OPPO Pad Air powered by the Snapdragon 680 chipset is one of the rivals that goes directly up against the Redmi Pad SE. Which model out of these two fairs well in competition? Read on below:

Redmi Pad SE Vs OPPO Pad Air: Display Specs

Display Parameters Xiaomi Redmi Pad SEOPPO Pad Air
Size11-inch10.36-inch
Panel typeLCDLCD
Resolution 1200 x 19201200 x 2000
Refresh rate 90Hz 60Hz

The newly launched Redmi Pad SE tablet model features an 11-inch display. The panel type is LCD which supports 90Hz refresh rate and 1200 x 1920 pixels screen resolution. This tablet’s screen offers a 400 nots peak brightness and 207 PPI pixel density.

The OPPO Pad Air has a slightly smaller 10.36-inch display which is also an IPS LCD panel similar to the Pad SE. The screen resolution is 1200 x 2000 pixels and the peak brightness levels are 360 nits which is again slightly lower compared to the Redmi Pad SE tablet variant. The refresh rate is also standard with the Pad Air, i.e., 60Hz. While both the tablets offer a decent display hardware, the higher refresh rate and resolution allows the Redmi Pad SE to take a lead here.

Also Read: Best Tablets Under Rs. 20,000 Available In India

Redmi Pad SE Vs OPPO Pad Air: Chipset Comparison

Performance MetricsRedmi Pad SEOPPO Pad Air
ChipsetSnapdragon 680 4G chipsetSnapdragon 680 4G chipset
RAMUp to 8GBUp to 6GB
StorageUp to 128GBUp to 128GB

Both Redmi Pad SE and the OPPO Pad Air uses the same Snapdragon 680 4G chipset for performance delivery. The mid-range Qualcomm chipset has octa-cores and is combined with Adreno 610 GPU for graphics.

While the Xiaomi Pad SE can be purchased with up to 8GB RAM and 128GB storage, the OPPO Pad Air offers up to 6GB RAM and 128GB storage option. The power delivery is almost similar with both Redmi pad SE and the OPPO Pad Air tablet models, but multitasking would be slightly better with the high-end 8GB RAM variant of the Redmi Pad SE.

Also Read: Buying A New Tablet: Here’s The List OF Best Tablets With Keyboard In India

Redmi Pad SE Vs OPPO Pad Air: Camera Features Comparison

Camera Parameters Redmi Pad SEOPPO Pad Air
Rear camera 8MP8MP
Front camera 5MP5MP

The Redmi Pad SE tablet is launched with a basic set of camera hardware. It comes with a single 8MP rear camera that has an f/2.2 aperture. It is capable of recording 1080p@30 fps videos. This new Redmi tablet sports a 5MP selfie snapper upfront. On the other hand, the OPPO Pad Air tablet also has a similar camera hardware where the back panel features an 8MP main sensor with an f/2.0 aperture, while the front panel accommodates a 5MP lens for selfies.

Also Read: Google Pixel Tablet Vs OnePlus Pad Vs Vivo Pad 2: Top Value Flagship Android Tablet In 2023

Redmi Pad SE Vs OPPO Pad Air: Battery Specs

The Redmi Pad SE tablet is packed with an 8,000 mAh battery pack which gets a standard 10W charging support. This tablet can easily last more than half a day with a single charge if being used moderately. On the other hand, the OPPO Pad Air features a smaller 7,100 mAh battery pack with 18W quick charging technology.

Also Read: Best Budget Android Tablets Under Rs. 10,000 In India In 2023

By Sandeep Sarkar

As the Assistant Editor, Sandeep is generating tech-oriented content and also monitoring the content published on the website. He has over six years of experience in tech journalism and has expertise in product reviews, news articles, listicles, and media campaigns.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *